2015
DOI: 10.1109/tfuzz.2014.2362145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy Reliability Assessment of Systems With Multiple-Dependent Competing Degradation Processes

Abstract: , and went to the University of Tennessee as a research associate. His current research interests include reliability modeling, uncertainty analysis, evolutionary computing, and Monte Carlo simulation. He is the author of more than 30 publications, all in refereed international journals, conferences, and books.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional reliability assessment methods regard the degradation process of system reliability or SOH as determined and seek to construct the underlying degradation model from a large number of historical data of similar equipments, without taking account the dynamics of operating conditions or specificity for a individual equipment [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Actually as noted by Bian, by now the majority of reliability prediction models are based on the assumption that the prevailing operating conditions are regarded as temporarily constant or irrelevant to the evolution process [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional reliability assessment methods regard the degradation process of system reliability or SOH as determined and seek to construct the underlying degradation model from a large number of historical data of similar equipments, without taking account the dynamics of operating conditions or specificity for a individual equipment [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Actually as noted by Bian, by now the majority of reliability prediction models are based on the assumption that the prevailing operating conditions are regarded as temporarily constant or irrelevant to the evolution process [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Song et al established the reliability models considering four failure conditions under the independent failure modes for a multicomponent series system, the effectiveness of which has been proved by numerical analysis. Lin et al investigated the fuzzy reliability evaluation methods for several dependent degradation failure modes, and the dependence of the deterioration process was described by a piecewise‐deterministic Markov model. The catastrophic failure mode was not considered in their model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] The approaches using condition monitoring information for system degradation modeling with competing failure modes usually include fuzzy physics-based model, 16 random shock models, 10,12,17 Wiener process, 18 and Markov models. 13,19,20 Among these models, Markov models are applied most extensively in the areas of reliability analysis and optimal maintenance decision-making. Besides, in many practical applications of CBM, the healthy or unhealthy states of the system cannot be observed directly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional reliability assessment computes the reliability of an equipment based on failure data from a (large) number of similar equipment [1,10,17,19,9]. This provides the reliability for the somewhat average equipment, without taking into account the specificity of the physical process of degradation and the related monitored data of the individual equipment under assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Lin et al [10], the simulation of a Piecewise Deterministic Markov Process (PDMP) model is performed for the reliability assessment of multiple dependent components with multi-state and continuous degradation processes, where the system degradation state is supposed to be precisely known and no uncertainty is considered. PDMP gives a same average result for different systems, without considering information on the specific system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%