2013
DOI: 10.1002/wrcr.20224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy multiobjective models for optimal operation of a hydropower system

Abstract: [1] Optimal operation models for a hydropower system using new fuzzy multiobjective mathematical programming models are developed and evaluated in this study. The models use (i) mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) with binary variables and (ii) integrate a new turbine unit commitment formulation along with water quality constraints used for evaluation of reservoir downstream impairment. Reardon method used in solution of genetic algorithm optimization problems forms the basis for development of a new f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fuzzy logic was identified as an appropriate tool to address the uncertainty due to imprecision in defining the goals of the stakeholders [29]. In this context, fuzzy water allocation models to address the uncertainty due to imprecision in defining the goals of the reservoir users has been widely used all over the world [46] and in India [47][48][49]. A typical fuzzy optimization model for reservoir operation works on specifying the goals of the users as fuzzy membership functions and the mathematical formulation of a typical reservoir operation as a water quantity control model, following Rehana and Mujumdar [4], which can be expressed as follows:…”
Section: Reservoir Operation and Associated Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuzzy logic was identified as an appropriate tool to address the uncertainty due to imprecision in defining the goals of the stakeholders [29]. In this context, fuzzy water allocation models to address the uncertainty due to imprecision in defining the goals of the reservoir users has been widely used all over the world [46] and in India [47][48][49]. A typical fuzzy optimization model for reservoir operation works on specifying the goals of the users as fuzzy membership functions and the mathematical formulation of a typical reservoir operation as a water quantity control model, following Rehana and Mujumdar [4], which can be expressed as follows:…”
Section: Reservoir Operation and Associated Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fontane et al () employed stochastic DP to quantify optimal monthly releases for a 12 month period in terms of hydropower generation, flood control, water supply, and recreational demands. Using a GA, Teegavarapu et al () analyzed the trade‐offs between power generation and downstream water quality using a simplistic one‐dimensional decay process on a daily timescale, Chen et al () performed daily and hourly reservoir system scheduling subject to fish flow and other competing constraints, and Liu et al () incorporated minimization of flood risk on a daily time step. These applications all assumed a well‐mixed system or were performed in one spatial dimension.…”
Section: Reservoir Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By evaluating the fitness of each individual, an optimal one is finally suggested as the solution of the optimization model. In recent years, GAs have been successfully used in numerous reservoir operation and water resource management studies (e.g., Bai et al, 2015;Teegavarapu et al, 2013;Yin and Yang, 2013). Therefore, a GA is chosen as the optimization model solution method in this study.…”
Section: Optimization Model Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New multi-objective optimization approaches were developed as a result of multiple reservoir operation targets (Adeyemo, 2011;Kurek and Ostfeld, 2013;Reddy and Kumar, 2007). Some creative operating approaches and rules were proposed for decision makers to resolve the interest conflicts of multiple stakeholders (Kerachian and Karamouz, 2006;Teegavarapu et al, 2013). These studies provided useful tools for directing reservoir operation and planning for downstream water quality protection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%