2016
DOI: 10.1002/int.21873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract: Given a multicriteria decision‐making problem, an obvious question emerges: Which method should be used to solve it? Although some efforts had been made, the question remains open. The aim of this contribution is to compare a set of multicriteria decision‐making methods sharing three features: same fuzzy information as input data, the need of a data normalization procedure, and quite similar information processing. We analyze the rankings produced by fuzzy MULTIMOORA, fuzzy TOPSIS (with two normalizations), fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ceballos et al [42] proposed a comparison of rankings calculated by F-MULTIMOORA, F-TOPSIS, F-VIKOR, and F-WASPAS to answer the primary question which occurs in every MCDM problem, which is "which method should be used to solve the ranking problem", and the result of this question is still open. Stević et al [43] applied a hybrid novel MCDM methodology including DEMATEL, EDAS, COPRAS and MULTIMOORA methods in a supplier selection problem in regard to a construction organization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ceballos et al [42] proposed a comparison of rankings calculated by F-MULTIMOORA, F-TOPSIS, F-VIKOR, and F-WASPAS to answer the primary question which occurs in every MCDM problem, which is "which method should be used to solve the ranking problem", and the result of this question is still open. Stević et al [43] applied a hybrid novel MCDM methodology including DEMATEL, EDAS, COPRAS and MULTIMOORA methods in a supplier selection problem in regard to a construction organization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes the ratio system (RS), the maximal objective reference point (MORP) and multiplicative form (MF) [59]. In practice, MULTIMOORA is proved to be the insensitivity method of multi-objective optimization (MOO) and high frequency used to solve MCDM problems under an uncertainty environment, because there is no other method that can meet all the robustness conditions of MOO [58,60]. Therefore, MULTIMOORA was used for company operation evaluation in many cases [61,62].…”
Section: Supplier Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting that Ceballos et al (2017) study how to choose an appropriate model among a number of fuzzy MADM models to solve a given fuzzy MADM problem. Specifically, they examine several fuzzy MADM models against over 1,200 randomly generated decision problems, and reveal their similarities and differences, the impact of their parameters settings, and how they can be clustered.…”
Section: Multi-attribute Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%