GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference 2017
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2017.8254739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Utility Based Network Selection Approach for High-Speed Railway Scenario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, user preference attributes cannot be accurately obtained. MADM-based network selection algorithms, for instance, simple additive weighting (SAW) [3,4], multiplicative exponent weighting (MEW) [5], grey relational analysis [6], order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) [7] as well as analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [8][9][10][11], rely on experiences to get near-optimal selection, but these methods lack strict theoretical proof of optimality. Machine learning-based algorithms in [12,13] utilise reinforcement learning to get network selection, while they depend too much on the accuracy of the data set and the processor performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, user preference attributes cannot be accurately obtained. MADM-based network selection algorithms, for instance, simple additive weighting (SAW) [3,4], multiplicative exponent weighting (MEW) [5], grey relational analysis [6], order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) [7] as well as analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [8][9][10][11], rely on experiences to get near-optimal selection, but these methods lack strict theoretical proof of optimality. Machine learning-based algorithms in [12,13] utilise reinforcement learning to get network selection, while they depend too much on the accuracy of the data set and the processor performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Compared with the existing network selection methods such as SAW [3], MEW [5], Q-learning based algorithm (QBNS) [12], improved multi-agent algorithm based on QBNS (MQBNS) and bipartite graph matching based algorithm (BGA) [26], NS-EG can not only improve average satisfaction and EE user experienced but also reduce average delay and overall PLR in 5G service scenarios with the increasing number of users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%