2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy Modeling to Forecast an Electric Load Time Series

Abstract: This paper tests and compares two types of modelling to predict the same time series. A time series of electric load was observed and, as a case study, we opted for the metropolitan region of Bahia State. The combination of three exogenous variables were attempted in each model. The exogenous variables are: the number of customers connected to the electricity distribution network, the temperature and the precipitation of rain. The linear model time series forecasting used was a SARIMAX. The modelling of comput… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Forecasting techniques employed to load prediction can be classified into two primary categories, including traditional statistical methods and artificial intelligent (AI) based methods. Traditional statistical methods, widely used in load prediction, contain the Auto-Regressive-Integrated-Moving-Average (ARIMA) models [20][21][22][23][24], time series regression models [25][26][27][28], fuzzy models [29][30][31][32], and grey prediction models [33][34][35][36]. AIbased methods are generally adaptive and robust to non-stationary data and make the prediction results with high accuracy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forecasting techniques employed to load prediction can be classified into two primary categories, including traditional statistical methods and artificial intelligent (AI) based methods. Traditional statistical methods, widely used in load prediction, contain the Auto-Regressive-Integrated-Moving-Average (ARIMA) models [20][21][22][23][24], time series regression models [25][26][27][28], fuzzy models [29][30][31][32], and grey prediction models [33][34][35][36]. AIbased methods are generally adaptive and robust to non-stationary data and make the prediction results with high accuracy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They conclude that the performance of neuro-fuzzy system was better than that of neural networks and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models. The number of customers connected to the electricity distribution network, the temperature and the precipitation of rain are used in [8] as exogenous variables for Seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average with exogenous variables (SARIMAX) and ANFIS models to forecast electric load time series. The ANFIS model gave lower forecast error values than the SARIMAX model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They conclude that the performance of neuro-fuzzy system was better than that of neural networks and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models. The number of customers connected to the electricity distribution network, the temperature and the precipitation of rain are used in [8] [11] developed and compared linear regression, artificial neural networks and ANFIS models for load prediction and found that ANFIS model gave more accurate results. For Canada's Ontario province, [12] used ANFIS to model electricity demand using data from the year 1976-2005.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 1 (left), there are 30 papers (30%) for national scale’s load prediction 1416 and 24 papers’ predictions (24%) are at city and region scale. 1719 It is recognized that most prediction models (46 papers, 46%) were used for energy prediction at building scale. Further, five building categories are classified, e.g., commercial, residential, educational and research, sports and simulation-based building types as shown in Figure 1 (right).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%