2006 12th Biennial IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation
DOI: 10.1109/cefc-06.2006.1632911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy Logic Adaptive Mesh Refinement for 3D Nonlinear Magnetostatic Problems Using Integral Equation Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For conventional solvers, the solution time speed up for adaptive mesh refinement over uniform non-adaptive meshes can be given by: (6) where P 1 is the number of passes required for non-adaptive solution to converge, P 2 is the number of passes till convergence for an adaptively refined solution, N i or N j being the number of unknowns at i-th or j-th pass respectively, and the subscripts 'na' and 'a' denote non-adaptive and adaptive respectively. Similarly, the memory savings can be given by the following relation:…”
Section: Multiple Ports and Multiple Frequency Sweepmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For conventional solvers, the solution time speed up for adaptive mesh refinement over uniform non-adaptive meshes can be given by: (6) where P 1 is the number of passes required for non-adaptive solution to converge, P 2 is the number of passes till convergence for an adaptively refined solution, N i or N j being the number of unknowns at i-th or j-th pass respectively, and the subscripts 'na' and 'a' denote non-adaptive and adaptive respectively. Similarly, the memory savings can be given by the following relation:…”
Section: Multiple Ports and Multiple Frequency Sweepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For MoM based methods involving static cases, local error estimates between potentials at adjacent nodes on the geometry has been taken as refinement criterion in [4]. Adaptive mesh generation scheme for 2D magnetostatic integral equations has been covered in [5], a fuzzy logic based scheme for non-linear 3D magnetostatic cases in [6], and a framework to permit easy hprefinement using Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) is presented in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For MoM-based methods involving static cases, local error estimates between potentials at adjacent nodes on the geometry have been taken as refinement criterion in [13]. Adaptive mesh generation scheme for 2-D magnetostatic integral equations has been covered in [14], a fuzzy logic-based scheme for nonlinear 3-D magnetostatic cases in [15], and a framework to permit easy hp-refinement using generalized method of moment is presented in [16]. Recently, for 3-D full-wave problems, an automatic h-refinement scheme for discontinuous Galerkin integral equations has been reported in [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%