2011
DOI: 10.1299/jsdd.5.1485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy Inverse Model of Magnetorheological Dampers for Semi-Active Vibration Control of an Eleven-Degrees of Freedom Suspension System

Abstract: A semi-active controller-based Fuzzy logic for a suspension system with magnetorheological (MR) dampers is presented and evaluated. An Inverse Fuzzy Model (IFM) is constructed to replicate the inverse dynamics of the MR damper. The typical control strategies are Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) and Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) controllers with a Clipped optimal control algorithm, while inherent time-delay and non-linear properties of MR damper lie in these strategies. LQR part of LQG controller is also desi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of control, many control strategies have been proposed in the literature, including PID control [16], fuzzy Logic control [17,18], optimal control [19,20], LQ/LQG control [21], H ∞ control [22], and control strategies based on genetic algorithms and neural networks [23][24][25]. However, one of the challenging problems in the design and implementation of intelligent suspension control systems is that there is currently no solution supporting the export of generic suspension models and control components for integration into embedded Electronic Control Units (ECUs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of control, many control strategies have been proposed in the literature, including PID control [16], fuzzy Logic control [17,18], optimal control [19,20], LQ/LQG control [21], H ∞ control [22], and control strategies based on genetic algorithms and neural networks [23][24][25]. However, one of the challenging problems in the design and implementation of intelligent suspension control systems is that there is currently no solution supporting the export of generic suspension models and control components for integration into embedded Electronic Control Units (ECUs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various control strategies and models have been proposed for semi-active vehicle suspension systems. This includes the use of non-parametric models [10][11][12] and parametric models [13][14][15][16], as well as different control strategies such as LQ (Linear-Quadratic)/LQG (Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian) control [17], H ∞ control [18], optimal control [19,20], fuzzy Logic control [21,22], PID control [23] and control strategies based on neural networks [24,25] and genetic algorithms [26]. However, the implementation of vehicle suspension models and controllers for embedded software requires very high efforts in creation, simplification, discretization and numerical solution, implementation, testing and fulfilling coding requirements, because no appropriate tool support is available and all parts have to be manually developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these systems, damping force generated by the magneto-rheological dampers (MRDs) to stamp out chassis vibration is controlled via the intensity of magnetic field by control strategies. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] As the inherent features, the hysteretic response and time varying of physical parameters of the magneto-rheological (MR) fluid due to system temperature variation during the operating process always exist. 2,3 This results in the model error or uncertainty implicit the time varying tendency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%