2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy implication operators for difference operations for fuzzy sets and cardinality-based measures of comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measuring similarity of uncertainty based information has attracted a lot of attention in probability theory [4,17], in belief function theory [8,14,21,26], in fuzzy set theory [3,6,9,23,24] and in credal set theory [1]. This is not the case for possibilistic uncertain information, in fact, few works have been done in this direction.…”
Section: Measuring Similarity Of Possibilistic Uncertain Informationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Measuring similarity of uncertainty based information has attracted a lot of attention in probability theory [4,17], in belief function theory [8,14,21,26], in fuzzy set theory [3,6,9,23,24] and in credal set theory [1]. This is not the case for possibilistic uncertain information, in fact, few works have been done in this direction.…”
Section: Measuring Similarity Of Possibilistic Uncertain Informationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In [21], the authors proposed a distance for the quantification of errors resulting from basic probability assignment approximations. Similarity measures between two fuzzy sets A and B have been also proposed in the literature [6] [9] [23] [24]. For instance, in the work by Bouchon-Meunier and al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We end this section with the review on regular fuzzy strict components of a given FWPR (see [11,13,14,16]). Fono and Andjiga [11] determined for any t-conorm S, a class of regular fuzzy strict preferences of a given FWPR R. Each class has a minimal element called the minimal regular fuzzy strict preference of R associated to S and defined as follows:…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it perfectly fits our system. For processing convenience, this theory is related to other theories [6,9,10,11], such as, probability theory, fuzzy set theory and belief function theory. The crossing between one theory to other, via existing transformation rules is often accompanied by a loss of information, i.e., an increase of imperfection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%