IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Sensing, Processing, Networking. IMTC Proceedings
DOI: 10.1109/imtc.1997.610184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy handling of measurement errors in instrumentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The histogram must then be transformed into a possibility distribution. The latter can be built using either a probability-possibility transformation (Dubois et al, 2004) or directly from statistical overlapped intervals (Mauris et al, 2000). The latter approach is adapted in the context of the application where the customers' evaluations are expressed with stars translated into score-bounded intervals.…”
Section: Possibilistic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The histogram must then be transformed into a possibility distribution. The latter can be built using either a probability-possibility transformation (Dubois et al, 2004) or directly from statistical overlapped intervals (Mauris et al, 2000). The latter approach is adapted in the context of the application where the customers' evaluations are expressed with stars translated into score-bounded intervals.…”
Section: Possibilistic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, our proposition is based on the fact that a possibility distribution p (with P the associated possibility measure and N the associated necessity measure) defines a family of probability distributions P that it dominates i.e., "A & R, N(A) 6 P(A) 6 P(A). Thus it can represent situations where P is not precisely known, but only in an approximate way (Mauris et al, 2000).…”
Section: Possibilistic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. (6). Also in this case a correlation factor r = 1 is taken for gain and offset affecting each acquired sample, whereas r = 0 is assumed for the effect of noise + quantization since it can take different values during the same measurement process.…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The way measurement uncertainty should be expressed and combined is the main problem discussed in the metrology and measurement science [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and several contributions have been recently published [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] in order to overcome the limitations of the GUM [1], which is the present reference document.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%