2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2015.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy fault isolation using gradient information and quality criteria from system identification models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first-class includes the detection of single faults by analyzing one or multiple parameters; the second class covers the detection of different faults with multiple parameters and processing techniques, and the last one contains the mixed techniques of various computing-intensive approaches to analyze different electrical and mechanical parameters in order to detect multiple faults [61][62][63][64]. In contrast to conventional signal processing based fault detection techniques [65], recently a few attempts are made for the application of intelligent algorithms [66,67] including new approaches to fault detection and isolation (FDI) [68] based on fuzzy logic, decision trees, neural networks, and further machine learning techniques [69][70][71][72][73]. However, most of them rely on the measurement and processing of vibration signals, which require at least one vibration sensor, which demands extra costs for its proper installation and maintenance [74][75][76][77].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first-class includes the detection of single faults by analyzing one or multiple parameters; the second class covers the detection of different faults with multiple parameters and processing techniques, and the last one contains the mixed techniques of various computing-intensive approaches to analyze different electrical and mechanical parameters in order to detect multiple faults [61][62][63][64]. In contrast to conventional signal processing based fault detection techniques [65], recently a few attempts are made for the application of intelligent algorithms [66,67] including new approaches to fault detection and isolation (FDI) [68] based on fuzzy logic, decision trees, neural networks, and further machine learning techniques [69][70][71][72][73]. However, most of them rely on the measurement and processing of vibration signals, which require at least one vibration sensor, which demands extra costs for its proper installation and maintenance [74][75][76][77].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fault detection and isolation (FDI) has been as well active fields of research for the standards of higher safety and reliability (see other related works 8,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. However, in practical engineering, as a result of unexpected factors, such as time delays, model uncertainties, disturbances, and noises, may occur in the faulty systems, it is quite difficult to get the accurate size and shape of the fault from only an FDI scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fault detection determines whether possible faults have occurred; early detection helps operators and maintenance personnel take corrective actions to prevent developing abnormal events from leading to serious process upsets. Fault isolation (also called fault identification) locates faulty variables closely related to detected faults; the isolation results assist field experts in diagnosing the faults precisely, i.e., it helps the system operators to determine which parts should be repaired or replaced [3]. Fault diagnosis investigates the root causes and/or sources of occurring faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%