2019
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy dark matter at cosmic dawn: new 21-cm constraints

Abstract: Potential small-scale discrepancies in the picture of galaxy formation painted by the ΛCDM paradigm have led to considerations of modified dark matter models. One such dark matter model that has recently attracted much attention is fuzzy dark matter (FDM). In FDM models, the dark matter is envisaged to be an ultra-light scalar field with a particle mass m FDM ∼ 10 −22 eV. This yields astronomically large de Broglie wavelengths which can suppress small-scale structure formation and give rise to the observed kpc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 206 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, choosing parameters such that the theoretical profiles overlap with the data at small radii is easy (in this case m 22 = 0.1, M vir 5 × 10 11 M ); however, it is not clear whether this profile would fit data at larger radii were it available. Furthermore, while the choice m 22 = 0.1 provides a reasonable fit to the data in this case, a ULDM particle mass m 22 = 0.1 is in tension with constraints from the Lyman-α forest, as well as high-redshift UV luminosity function comparisons d (Amendola and Barbieri 2006;Bozek et al 2015;Armengaud et al 2017;Ni et al 2019;Nebrin, Ghara, & Mellema 2020). It must be acknowledged, however, that baryonic feedback is expected to have the greatest impact in the innermost regions of realistic halos.…”
Section: Uldm and Cdm Halos And Astrophysical Datamentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, choosing parameters such that the theoretical profiles overlap with the data at small radii is easy (in this case m 22 = 0.1, M vir 5 × 10 11 M ); however, it is not clear whether this profile would fit data at larger radii were it available. Furthermore, while the choice m 22 = 0.1 provides a reasonable fit to the data in this case, a ULDM particle mass m 22 = 0.1 is in tension with constraints from the Lyman-α forest, as well as high-redshift UV luminosity function comparisons d (Amendola and Barbieri 2006;Bozek et al 2015;Armengaud et al 2017;Ni et al 2019;Nebrin, Ghara, & Mellema 2020). It must be acknowledged, however, that baryonic feedback is expected to have the greatest impact in the innermost regions of realistic halos.…”
Section: Uldm and Cdm Halos And Astrophysical Datamentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Interestingly, however, a better fit to the lower velocity SPARC data is obtained from a ULDM profile where m 22 = 0.1 and M vir = 5 × 10 11 M . It must be noted, however, that a ULDM mass this small is in tension with other constraints [36][37][38][39][40]. Tightening these constraints on the plausible ULDM particle mass will inform future investigations of this type [41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 21 cm HI absorption signal reported by the EDGES experiment was used to constrain the FDM mass to m ≥ 5 × 10 −21 eV [120] and m ≥ 8 × 10 −21 eV [121] (see also [122] for a recent analysis). These are the strongest bounds to date that follow from the low-mass cutoff of the halo mass function.…”
Section: Validating Merger Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, a number of other works have been devoted to proposing alternative explanations for the anomalous EDGES detection, or utilizing such a signal to place constraints on fundamental physics assuming the signal itself is genuine (see e.g. [157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181] for a very limited list of works in these directions). We shall also follow this approach here: restricting our attention to the unified dark sector models we discussed in Sec.…”
Section: B the Edges Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%