2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-013-1034-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy characterization of spike synchrony in parallel spike trains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We call functions of this form influence maps (and the windows of the form [ t i − w /2, t i + w /2] underlying them are called influence regions ). Such functions constitute the building blocks of the synchrony model that we introduce in our companion paper [ 21 ], which is characterized by a graded notion of synchrony (which differs substantially from the intended notion of synchrony in this paper, which is bivalent): the degree of synchrony among two or more spikes is defined as the integral (i.e., area) of the intersection of their corresponding influence maps. Such degree is thus a value in the interval [0,1] (e.g., 0 if the time distance between any two spikes is greater than or equal to w and 1 if there is exact time synchrony between them).…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We call functions of this form influence maps (and the windows of the form [ t i − w /2, t i + w /2] underlying them are called influence regions ). Such functions constitute the building blocks of the synchrony model that we introduce in our companion paper [ 21 ], which is characterized by a graded notion of synchrony (which differs substantially from the intended notion of synchrony in this paper, which is bivalent): the degree of synchrony among two or more spikes is defined as the integral (i.e., area) of the intersection of their corresponding influence maps. Such degree is thus a value in the interval [0,1] (e.g., 0 if the time distance between any two spikes is greater than or equal to w and 1 if there is exact time synchrony between them).…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is illustrated in Figure 2, where two of the three coincidences of the eight neurons (shown in color) cannot be detected, because they are split by badly placed time bin boundaries. These problems have been addressed with the influence map approach (see [24,7]), which bears some resemblance to the definition of a distance measure for continuous spike trains suggested in [26]. The core idea is to surround each spike time with an influence region, which specifies how imprecisely another spike may be placed, which is still to be considered as synchronous.…”
Section: Soft Pattern Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%