Fuzzy Belief Structure Based Vikor Method: An Application for Ranking Delay Causes of Tehran Metro System by Fmea Criteria

Hajiagha, Seyed Hossein Razavi; Hashemi, Shide Sadat; Mohammadi, Yousef; Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras

doi:10.3846/16484142.2016.1133454

Cited by 37 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Since the assessment of the water security is based on the consideration of a multitude of criteria and indicators, it requires the use of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods. These methods provide capacities to determine the value, degree of importance and the priority order for a number of alternatives and to select the best alternative [31][32][33][34]. According to recent papers [32,35,36] and the use of experts' judgment in this work, the risk matrix analysis method [8,13,22,36,37], as well as the wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) [30] were used in this research.…”

Section: Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of the Urban Water Security in a Severe Water Stress Area–Application to Palestinian Cities

Jabari

Shahrour

Khattabi

2020

Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents an assessment of the urban water security in a severe water stress area using a semi-quantitative risk-based approach. Water security indicators are selected according to the recommendations of international institutions, the literature review and the opinion of a panel of water experts. Selected indicators cover three fields: water resources, water services and water governance. The field of water resources is described by indicators related to the water resources availability, annual precipitation and the ratio of treated water, while the water services field is described by indicators related to the water service coverage, water losses and the continuity of water supply. Water governance includes three indicators: role and responsibility, access to water information and stakeholder engagement. Water security assessment is conducted in three stages: (i) data collection for five Palestinian cities in the West Bank of Jordan, (ii) determination of the risk score for each indicator using collected data and an expert’s opinion, (iii) determination of the global water security score and water security index using the matrix risk assessment and the wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) methods. Results show that water risk is ranked as extreme for all cities. Risk related to water resources is a major contributor to global risk, followed by water governance.

show abstract

Section: Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of the Urban Water Security in a Severe Water Stress Area–Application to Palestinian Cities

Jabari

Shahrour

Khattabi

2020

Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The outcome of the attack trees serves as a starting point for the next step, the penetration testing. However, this outcome could be used also as a starting point of other safety methods (Ghadi et al, 2019;Gopalakrishnan et al, 2018), like FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) (Hajiagha et al, 2016). In order to achieve this, the attack potential number has to be introduced to every step in the attack tree, which can be important from security point of view.…”

Section: Classification Of Security Levelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Novel Approaches to Evaluate the Ability of Vehicles for Secured Transportation

Kocsis

Vida

Szalay

et al. 2019

Period. Polytech. Transp. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The assurance of process safety plays an important role in the field of information technology. Securing the information has become one of the biggest challenges in the present day. Whenever we think about the protected systems the first thing that comes to our mind can be malicious interventions which are increasing immensely day by day. Nowadays we live the world of huge automotive developments with the appearance of the demand for autonomous vehicles. On the other hand, technological developments also provide a lot of advantages for the society. The benefits of autonomous cars include reduced mobility costs, increased safety, increased mobility, significant reduction of traffic collisions. However, it cannot be forgotten that the extension of cyberspace affects the transportation increasingly. Accordingly, cars are produced with high level of connectivity and automation. Therefore, the risks arriving from the cyberspace can now endanger the safe and secured transportation. These tendencies shall motivate manufacturers and developers to permanently improve the ability of vehicles to protect themselves and their passengers.

show abstract

“…22 Also, MULTIMOORA method, TOPSIS method, VIsekriterijumska optimizacija i KOmpromisno Resenje method and some other group decisionmaking (GDM) methods have made many contributions in determining the risk prioritization of failure modes in FMEA. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Although these linguistic FMEA approaches are very effective in practical applications, there are still several critical issues that have been ignored: 1. Differences in linguistic risk assessment information.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Consensus building in linguistic failure mode and effect analysis: A perspective based on prospect theory

Fan

Zhu

Wei

et al. 2020

Quality & Reliability Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As one of many scientific and efficient risk assessment approaches, failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) has been widely applied across various fields. There are two core issues in the FMEA approach: identifying the latent failure modes of the systems, products, processes and services and the risk assessment and the prioritization of those failure modes. Then, corrective measures must be taken in a timely and accessible manner to prevent the occurrence of failure modes with higher risk levels. In practice, several FMEA members from different fields are usually involved in the FMEA implementation process; the risk assessment information given by them may vary greatly. Therefore, it is necessary to integrate a consensus-building process into FMEA. Meanwhile, the psychological behaviours of FMEA members have had a great impact on the final prioritization of failure modes. Prospect theory is an effective approach for describing individual psychological behaviours. Therefore, this paper presents a novel linguistic FMEA approach to address the consensus issue from the perspective of prospect theory. In the proposed linguistic FMEA approach, a consensus measurement approach based on prospect theory is constructed. Then, a novel feedback adjustment mechanism is designed in which FMEA members can adjust not only their assessment information but also their reference points to achieve an acceptable consensus degree. Eventually, a practical application is used to show the validity and applicability of the proposed linguistic FMEA approach.

show abstract

Fuzzy Belief Structure Based Vikor Method: An Application for Ranking Delay Causes of Tehran Metro System by Fmea Criteria

Cited by 37 publications

References 46 publications

Assessment of the Urban Water Security in a Severe Water Stress Area–Application to Palestinian Cities

Assessment of the Urban Water Security in a Severe Water Stress Area–Application to Palestinian Cities

Novel Approaches to Evaluate the Ability of Vehicles for Secured Transportation

Consensus building in linguistic failure mode and effect analysis: A perspective based on prospect theory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About