2006
DOI: 10.1080/10286600600789425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy approach in the uncertainty analysis of the water distribution network of Becej

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method required solving several nonlinear optimization problems. Branisavljevic and Ivetic (2006) used genetic algorithm for solving the nonlinear optimization models for finding the uncertainty in dependent parameters considering uncertainty in roughness of old pipes. Bhave and Gupta (2006) Gupta and Bhave (2007) showed that dependent parameters change monotonically with independent parameters and suggested a simple method in which the impact of the change of independent parameters on a dependent parameter is determined in the first stage.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method required solving several nonlinear optimization problems. Branisavljevic and Ivetic (2006) used genetic algorithm for solving the nonlinear optimization models for finding the uncertainty in dependent parameters considering uncertainty in roughness of old pipes. Bhave and Gupta (2006) Gupta and Bhave (2007) showed that dependent parameters change monotonically with independent parameters and suggested a simple method in which the impact of the change of independent parameters on a dependent parameter is determined in the first stage.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methodologies have been suggested in the recent past to show how parameter uncertainty is propagated to dependent parameters by considering uncertain parameters as fuzzy (Revelli and Ridolfi 2002, Branisavljevic and Ivetic 2006, Shibu and Reddy 2011, Spiliotis and Tsakiris 2012. All these methods assume that uncertain demands are satisfied at all demand nodes which may not be true.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of the affinity hydration model relies on the fact that only few parameters have to be calibrated to predict cement hydration kinetics. Despite Equation (4) having less parameters and performing reasonably well on non-blended cements [32], prediction mismatches are likely observed at either early (t = 1 to 3 days) or later stages (t > 14 days) when simulating the kinetics of blended cements. Notice that, at present, blended cements represent the greatest share of commercialized cement and tend to contain less and less clinker [1].…”
Section: Affinity Hydration Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure for calculating the output ␣-cut interval boundaries is innovative and differs significantly from the common approaches on the subject on two aspects: • if the model output value is monotonic in the space of input variable intervals, then extremes are calculated only by using extreme values of input variable intervals as input data; • otherwise, an optimization method is required for determining the output extremes [2,22].…”
Section: Application Of Fuzzy Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%