2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy AHP analysis of Internet of Things (IoT) in enterprises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
40
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, they solved practical problems related to traffic flow management and selection of advertisement spots that can optimize the visibility of advertisements by the proposed model. Ly et al [27] evaluated the influential factors in building a successful internet of things (IoT) system for IoT-related enterprises based on the FAHP method. The results indicated that tangible factors (security, value, and connectivity) are more important than intangible factors (telepresence and intelligence).…”
Section: Fuzzy Ahp Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, they solved practical problems related to traffic flow management and selection of advertisement spots that can optimize the visibility of advertisements by the proposed model. Ly et al [27] evaluated the influential factors in building a successful internet of things (IoT) system for IoT-related enterprises based on the FAHP method. The results indicated that tangible factors (security, value, and connectivity) are more important than intangible factors (telepresence and intelligence).…”
Section: Fuzzy Ahp Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though AHP is commonly used, this algorithm cannot adequately resolve the inherent uncertainties and imprecisions associated with mapping decision maker's perceptions into exact numbers [16]. Hence, numerous previous studies have combined the fuzzy set theory with AHP to solve uncertain issues [26][27][28][29][30][31]. Zhü [32] proposed that fuzzy AHP (FAHP) cannot resolve uncertain questions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to carry out the research, the authors used the author's conversion method that has many advantages. Among them, it is essential to mention that it combines both the precision of the results of the multicriteria methods, such as the AHP (Kubler, Robert, Derigent, Voisin, & Traona, 2016;Lya, Lai, Hsu, & Shih, 2018), ANP (Becker, Becker, Sulikowski, & Zdziebko, 2018), the ELECTRE (Corrente, Greco, & Słowiński, 2016), the PROMETHEE (Andreopoulou, Koliouska, Galariotis, & Zopounidis, 2018), verbal methods (Trzaskalik, 2014), TOPSIS (Chmielarz & Zborowski, 2018), BIPOLAR (Trzaskalik, 2014). Moreover, the process of collecting data for calculations is as simple as in a case of the scoring method, and the simplicity of the result processing which is the characteristic of the scoring method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They integrated different decision-making processes with different methodologies, giving them a perspective on evaluation processes. Ly et al [15] aimed to analyze the factors affecting the creation of successful IoT system for enterprises, Erdogan et al [16] to find the best strategy for the application of Industry 4.0, Yoon et al [17] to analyze the important factors related to the innovation of business models by using Analytical Network Processes (ANP) technique, Erbay and Yıldırım [18] to the selection of technology on Industry 4.0 technologies, Keskin et al [19] to model the preparatory stages of organizational processes. Kayikci et al [20] who draw attention to open and interconnected logistics services provided by Industry 4.0 and new opportunities to promote cooperation in transportation, conducted strategic compliance studies within the scope of supply chain partners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%