2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2005.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzziness and randomness in investment project risk appraisal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To do good risk mitigation therefore, analyst need both. One of the most intricate parts accompanying risk mitigation is the quantification of risk (Rebiasz, 2007). Some of these quantitative techniques are less applicable as they necessitate the need for detailed information which is generally not available at the planning stage and thus there is a difficulty in making accurate decisions (Dey, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do good risk mitigation therefore, analyst need both. One of the most intricate parts accompanying risk mitigation is the quantification of risk (Rebiasz, 2007). Some of these quantitative techniques are less applicable as they necessitate the need for detailed information which is generally not available at the planning stage and thus there is a difficulty in making accurate decisions (Dey, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the branches on this process flow is developed similar to Rebiasz [32] to find and analyzing the project risk by determining fuzzy values for the project parameters and using in a simulation model by converting them into probability distribution. Different from Rebiasz [32], not only the fuzzy parameter values are converted into probabilistic values and analyzed via simulation model but also this study handles the fuzzy NPV by utilizing the fuzzy operations and interpreting directly the fuzzy project risk. Besides to that, calculation procedure and simulation analysis are also presented for directly stochastic and deterministic conditions.…”
Section: Simulation and Fuzzy Sets For Determination Of The Project Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the studies contributing this trend; Iwamura [19] and Huang [20] with the constraint programming approach based on fuzzy data to optimize capital budget; using neural network as a simulation metamodel in economic analysis of risky projects in [21]; R&D project evaluation model based on fuzzy set priority in [22]; transportation projects selection process using fuzzy sets theory in [23]; risk management of an agricultural investment utilizing simulation in [24]; fuzzy capital budgeting in [25]; modeling project investment decisions using possibility theory in [26]; the capital budgeting through random numbers and fuzzy numbers in [27]; using simulation software to solve engineering economy problems in [28]; characterizing the optimal profit of an investment problem with trapezoidal fuzzy numbers in [29]; the evaluation of investment projects optimizing multiple criteria via simulation and response surface methodology in [10]; Multicriteria decision making in a fuzzy setting in [30]; the optimal investment project selection based on fuzzy numbers and genetic algorithm in [31]; project risk assessment by converting the fuzzy numbers to the near probability distributions and analyzing through simulation techniques in [32] can be examined in the literature.…”
Section: Simulation and Fuzzy Sets For Determination Of The Project Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the model was made for investment portfolios, it was not suitable for project selection problems. Rebiasz [52] developed a model to assess projects risk with fuzzy or random parameters. This simulation-based model was only aimed at project risk evaluation and was not a project portfolio selection model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%