2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0341-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzz Testing in Stack-Based Buffer Overflow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This class of attacks exploits a type of bug defined buffer overflow (also defined buffer overrun), where a targeted program write more data to a buffer than it can hold, due to the absence of a buffer bounds checking. Such an operation allows the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the target system [75,76] The aforementioned classes of attacks are exploited in order to conduct dangerous well-known attacks such as SYN flooding, IP spoofing, session hijacking, man-in-the-middle, DHCP starvation, and many more [77]. It should be underlined that their intrinsic dangerousness arises from the fact that many of these attacks do not require any in-depth expertise, since they can be conducted using tools easily available on the Internet [78].…”
Section: Denial Of Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This class of attacks exploits a type of bug defined buffer overflow (also defined buffer overrun), where a targeted program write more data to a buffer than it can hold, due to the absence of a buffer bounds checking. Such an operation allows the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the target system [75,76] The aforementioned classes of attacks are exploited in order to conduct dangerous well-known attacks such as SYN flooding, IP spoofing, session hijacking, man-in-the-middle, DHCP starvation, and many more [77]. It should be underlined that their intrinsic dangerousness arises from the fact that many of these attacks do not require any in-depth expertise, since they can be conducted using tools easily available on the Internet [78].…”
Section: Denial Of Servicementioning
confidence: 99%