The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2019.1647643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Futures of digital death: Past, present and charting emerging research agenda

Abstract: This special issue entitled "Futures of Digital Death: Mobilities of Loss and Commemoration" explores the topic of digital death and how technologies are reconfigured by and reconfiguring social relationships with the deceased and dying loved ones as well as the larger ecosystem supporting such relationships. This Introduction article starts with an overview of the past research on digital death intended to provide a relevant context for the five papers included in this issue. Then, we reflect on how the curre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, for Fang Fang, the disruption of the liminal rite of passage is heart-breaking, as she writes that 'I'm quite concerned for families that have lost someone […] they won't be able to handle this extended period of repression' (Fang, 2020: 234). With such statements, we could say Fang Fang is sharing and configuring ideas like what Sas et al (2019) calls the 'leveraging digital craft for helping bereaved people process grief' (411, our emphasis). Fang Fang not only expresses herself, but through what Kohn, Gibbs, Arnold, and Nansen.…”
Section: Liminalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As such, for Fang Fang, the disruption of the liminal rite of passage is heart-breaking, as she writes that 'I'm quite concerned for families that have lost someone […] they won't be able to handle this extended period of repression' (Fang, 2020: 234). With such statements, we could say Fang Fang is sharing and configuring ideas like what Sas et al (2019) calls the 'leveraging digital craft for helping bereaved people process grief' (411, our emphasis). Fang Fang not only expresses herself, but through what Kohn, Gibbs, Arnold, and Nansen.…”
Section: Liminalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with physical memorials and institutionalized traditional burials, the use of digital images is turning into alternative vernacular forms of grieving, which are becoming mediators of the grieving process, at the same time as generating informal and personalized reactions about death and loss (Arnold, Gibbs, Kohn, Meese, & Nansen, 2017). We place the paper within this broader framework of digital mourning as a new phenomenon under researched within the context of COVID-19, acknowledging that more generally research on the technologies for grief and death-oriented online support rituals do exist (Sas, Schreiter, Büscher, Gamba, & Coman, 2019).…”
Section: Rites Of Passages In Deadly Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, we are living in an age with unforeseen capabilities to make both physical and digital "things" and where each person's life has an unavoidable associated trail of media and personal data. New opportunities to curate data and media to support others after our future death or to support ourselves in bereavement are substantial [14,18] and the contexts of anticipating end of life and living with bereavement are changing as digital technologies become more embedded in our cultures [13,15]. While it is easy to recognize that these opportunities for design are significant, and that the need is substantial and largely unaddressed, the barriers to working in a such sensitive context are perceived by many HCI researchers as overly daunting.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing attention has been paid to technologies for grief, end of life, and digital possessions (Sas et al, 2019), and also to digital remains as big data (Karppi, 2018;Öhman & Watson, 2019). However, these perspectives often focus on the (important) question of how digital remains are mediated by corporate interests (as Facebook profiles especially), and less on the environmental impact of the mass-scale preservation required for such a model.…”
Section: Maintaining Digital Remainsmentioning
confidence: 99%