Proceedings of the 2009 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining 2009
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611972795.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FutureRank: Ranking Scientific Articles by Predicting their Future PageRank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
148
0
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
148
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is important for researchers to be able to find such recent articles because they can discover new research directions, solutions and approaches, and digest new work that is relevant to their current interests. As such, Sayyadi and Getoor [28] proposed "FutureRank" which computes the expected future PageRank, focusing on citation network of scholarly papers.…”
Section: Ranking Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important for researchers to be able to find such recent articles because they can discover new research directions, solutions and approaches, and digest new work that is relevant to their current interests. As such, Sayyadi and Getoor [28] proposed "FutureRank" which computes the expected future PageRank, focusing on citation network of scholarly papers.…”
Section: Ranking Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond simple citations count, researchers have explored methods that analyze the structure of citation networks to identify important papers [31], [32] or predict which papers will be important in the future [33].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7.2, an approach which takes into account the peculiar properties of each dataset will give better results. Considering that in literature there are already a notable amount of ranking algorithms that are dataset specific, such as [18,19] for citation networks or Dissipative Heat Conductance [12] for strongly hierarchical datasets like taxonomies or geo-databases, DING has been designed to exploit better alternatives to LinkCount and EntityRank. One can also define its own algorithm using dataset-dependent ranking criteria.…”
Section: Semantic-dependent Entity Ranking Datasets On the Web Of Damentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measure the Spearman's correlation [21] of the two local algorithms with GER using the full entity rank list of three datasets: DBpedia, Citesser and Geonames. The Spearman's correlation has already been employed in [18] to compare several Table 2 7 . While LLC performs slightly worse than LER, the Spearman's correlation indicates a strong correlation of the two algorithms with GER.…”
Section: Accuracy Of Local Entity Rankmentioning
confidence: 99%