Future Supply and Demand for Oncologists : Challenges to Assuring Access to Oncology Services

Abstract

Purpose: To conduct a comprehensive analysis of supply of and demand for oncology services through 2020. This study was commissioned by the Board of Directors of ASCO.Methods: New data on physician supply gathered from surveys of practicing oncologists, oncology fellows, and fellowship program directors were analyzed, along with 2005 American Medical Association Masterfile data on practicing medical oncologists, hematologists/oncologists, and gynecologic oncologists, to determine the baseline capacity and to forecast visit capacity through 2020. Demand for visits was calculated by applying age-, sex-, and time-from-diagnosis-visit rate data from the National Cancer Institute's analysis of the 1998 to 2002 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to the National Cancer Institute's cancer incidence and prevalence projections. The cancer incidence and prevalence projections were calculated by applying a 3-year average (2000 -2002) of age-and sex-specific cancer rates from SEER to the US Census Bureau population projections released on March 2004. The baseline supply and demand forecasts assume no change in cancer care delivery and physician practice patterns. Alternate scenarios were constructed by changing assumptions in the baseline models.Results: Demand for oncology services is expected to rise rapidly, driven by the aging and growth of the population and improvements in cancer survival rates, at the same time the oncology workforce is aging and retiring in increasing numbers. Demand is expected to rise 48% between 2005 and 2020. The supply of services provided by oncologists during this time is expected to grow more slowly, approximately 14%, based on the current age distribution and practice patterns of oncologists and the number of oncology fellowship positions. This translates into a shortage of 9.4 to 15.0 million visits, or 2,550 to 4,080 oncologists-roughly one-quarter to one-third of the 2005 supply. The baseline projections do not include any alterations based on changes in practice patterns, service use, or cancer treatments. Various alternate scenarios were also developed to show how supply and demand might change under different assumptions.Conclusions: ASCO, policy makers, and the public have major challenges ahead of them to forestall likely shortages in the capacity to meet future demand for oncology services. A multifaceted strategy will be needed to ensure that Americans have access to oncology services in 2020, as no single action will fill the likely gap between supply and demand. Among the options to consider are increasing the number of oncology fellowship positions, increasing use of nonphysician clinicians, increasing the role of primary care physicians in the care of patients in remission, and redesigning service delivery.

Radiation therapy at the end of life in patients with incurable nonsmall cell lung cancer

“…Although all the centers contributing to the database are academic research institutions, most RT in the United States is provided in the private setting. 23 Therefore, it may be inaccurate to generalize our findings to the field as a whole. Third, we have limited this report to patients with NSCLC.…”

Institute of Medicine Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Cancer Care: What Do They Mean for the General Internist?

“…17 Further complicating the future of cancer care are the existing and projected workforce shortages for oncology and primary care clinicians. 3,4,19,20 To achieve efficiencies in caring for cancer patients, inter-professional collaboration is critical and should be promoted by health systems and professional societies.…”

“…However, the oncology workforce is not expected to keep up with the demand. 3,4 Further, the costs of cancer care continue to increase, outpacing the rise in the costs of care for non-cancer conditions, 3 and may begin to account for a greater share of total health care spending. 5 These factors contribute to a potential crisis in both access and costs, and characterize a cancer care system that is not sustainable.…”

Mentoring by Design: Integrating Medical Professional Competencies into Bioengineering and Medical Physics Graduate Training

“…The number of individuals projected to enter these diverse fields is unlikely to be sufficient to meet the needs of an aging and increasingly diverse population. Serious shortages in the oncology workforce are predicted by 2020 [4,5], and the World Health Organization [6], professional organizations [7,8], and others [9] have stated that to ensure rapid advances in oncology in the coming decades, the cancer research workforce must be invigorated with specialists from emerging fields who are well prepared to 1) ask scientific questions influenced by the experience of those who care for patients, 2) communicate effectively and work collaboratively with multidisciplinary oncology clinical and research teams, and 3) advance discovery and 4 technology to improve diagnosis and discover new treatments and cures in the field of cancer medicine [6][7][8][9].…”