2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.coche.2022.100833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future perspective on redox flow batteries: aqueous versus nonaqueous electrolytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most notably, opening RFBs up to organics opens up to a plethora of solvents, each with its own limitations [89]. One major contributing factor to increasing theoretical energy densities is the increase in the potential stability window for many organic solvents compared to water [90]. Since the first report on the concept on non-aqueous flow batteries in 1984 [91], however, the large number of contributions seems to have converged to a select few promising organic media to consider for AORFBs, fairly independent of changes in the electrolyte structure (Figure 7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most notably, opening RFBs up to organics opens up to a plethora of solvents, each with its own limitations [89]. One major contributing factor to increasing theoretical energy densities is the increase in the potential stability window for many organic solvents compared to water [90]. Since the first report on the concept on non-aqueous flow batteries in 1984 [91], however, the large number of contributions seems to have converged to a select few promising organic media to consider for AORFBs, fairly independent of changes in the electrolyte structure (Figure 7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the quasi-reversibility in cyclic voltammetry, the coulombic efficiency of the catholyte-anolyte pair was shown to be 90% over the first 20 charge-discharge cycles in acetonitrile. The higher overall capital costs of organic solvents and supporting electrolytes, such as bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (TFSI -) and PF 6 − , put the AORFB at a disadvantage to its aqueous counterpart, but increasingly, higher current densities (15-100 mA cm −2 ) and energy densities are being reached to achieve the set-out goal of >$100 (kW h) −1 [90]. Shortly after the pioneering work involving N-methylphthalimide and TEMPO, many alternative all-organic catholyte-anolyte pairs started to appear, along with some bipolar electrolytes (capable of both functions simultaneously [106]), showing great promise for the design of next-generation RFBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of all rechargeable battery technologies, the redox ow battery (RFB) adopting metal or organic redox actives dissolved in aqueous electrolyte solutions shows the greatest promise for grid applications, [1][2][3] as safety concerns in relation to re and explosion of the battery are fully overcome. To date, various redox chemistries have been reported for use in redox ow batteries, such as iron-chromium RFBs, 4,5 all-vanadium RFBs, [6][7][8] zinc based RFBs, [9][10][11] all-iron RFBs, 12,13 organic RFBs, 14 etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Redox-active electrolytes based on quinones, viologen, TEMPO, phenazine, and alloxazine derivatives are among the most evaluated organic molecules for aqueous redox flow batteries. However, only a few anthraquinone, phenazine, and viologen derivatives demonstrated long-term stability. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%