Future pathways of a sector in transition

Abstract

The future of scholarly publishing, in particular the growth of Open Access publishing and how it is financially sustained, is hotly debated. Many different models, advantages, and disadvantages are being discussed. Yet, there is little consensus about what a future system should look like or how it should be governed. To describe the ongoing dynamics in scholarly publishing, this paper introduces the multilevel perspective on socio-technical transitions (MLP). This explorative application of the MLP addresses five possible transition pathways: transformation, reconfiguration, substitution, de-alignment & re-alignment, or a sequence. The analysis shows that incumbents survive by adapting to niche innovations and withstanding landscape pressure by innovating themselves, in terms of technology, business models and through acquisitions. In other words, the current trajectory reproduces the oligopoly of incumbents. This means that the sector is, at minimum, on a trajectory of transformation or, potentially, reconfiguration. This diagnosis may change when the dynamics change, for instance if niche innovations and landscape pressure converged stronger on an alternative pathway.

Ajankohtaista ja kiperää tiedekustantamisessa ja -julkaisemisessa

“…Joissakin esityksissä pyrittiin mallintamaan avoimen julkaisemisen tai avoimen tutkimuksen nykytilaa enemmän tai vähemmän onnistuneesti. Brysselin Vrije-yliopiston Lennart Stoyn sosio-tekninen lähestymistapa avoimen julkaisemisen markkinoista (Stoy 2022) oli melko tekninen ja vaikeaselkoinen ja osoitti, että avoimen julkaisemisen käsitteellistäminen ja mallintaminen ei ole mikään helppo juttu.…”