1994
DOI: 10.1089/scd.1.1994.3.213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future Paradigm for Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation: Tumor Purging andEx VivoProduction of Normal Stem and Progenitor Cells

Abstract: A major concern in autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) is the possible contamination of the graft with tumor cells. Transplantation of malignant cells, along with normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, may contribute to relapse of disease. Therefore, a growing strategy is to subject autologous marrow to some type of purging procedure to eliminate tumor cells selectively. Transplantation of purged marrow, however, often results in a delayed engraftment associated with (specific or nonspecific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A U TOLO GO US S TEM C ELL TR AN SPL AN TATION for reconstituting a cancer patient's hematopoietic system following dose-intensive chemotherapy and radiation therapy can be confounded by metastatic tumor cell contamination of the graft, which may cause disease recurrence (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). Currently, tumor cells are purged from autografts by pharmacologic, immunologic, or biophysical methods (6) or by positive selection of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) with CD34 antibody-sensitized magnetic beads (7,8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A U TOLO GO US S TEM C ELL TR AN SPL AN TATION for reconstituting a cancer patient's hematopoietic system following dose-intensive chemotherapy and radiation therapy can be confounded by metastatic tumor cell contamination of the graft, which may cause disease recurrence (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). Currently, tumor cells are purged from autografts by pharmacologic, immunologic, or biophysical methods (6) or by positive selection of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) with CD34 antibody-sensitized magnetic beads (7,8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 The selection of CD34 ϩ hematopoietic progenitor cells also has been used to reduce TC reinfusion, although this strategy may be slightly less effective (1-2.5 logs). However, purging using cytotoxic drugs often leads to delayed engraftment, 44 and purging by CD34 ϩ cell selection may inhibit immune recovery. 45 Furthermore, the loss of p53 function is known to be associated with TC resistance to antitumor therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations suggest that TC removal (purging) from stem cell products could significantly affect clinical outcome. The use of monoclonal antibodies against membrane antigens with cytotoxic drugs or toxins, phototherapy, biological response modifiers, or cytotoxic drugs can reduce tumor contamination by 1–3 logs but often with delayed engraftment [30]. The selection of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells also has been used to reduce TC reinfusion, with the results slightly less effective (1–2.5 logs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%