Future Natural Gas Price Forecasting Model and Its Policy Implication

Abstract

Future natural gas (FNG) price is a collected data over the years and is a volatile movement in the market. In other words, FNG price is categorised as a time series data with volatility in both variance and mean, as well as most likely in some cases having heteroscedasticity problem. To come up with an estimated prediction model, some analysis tools, such as autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and generalised autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH), are introduced to find the best-fitted model having the smallest error value with high significance of probability value. This study aims to examine the best-fitted model that allows us to forecast FNG prices more accurately in the near future. There are 2842 observed data of daily FNG prices from 2009 to 2019 as the input of study objects. The finding suggests that the first measurement model of ARIMA (1,1,1) does not fit the model as having a non-significant probability value. Thus, it is required to check its heteroscedasticity by conducting an ARCH effect test. It is concluded that a data set has an effect of ARCH, so AR (p)-GARCH (p,q) model is then tested. AR (1)-GARCH (1,1) model is believed to be a best-fitted model having a significant P < 0.0001 with significantly small mean squared error and root mean squared error values, indicating that it has a very accurate prediction model. The forecasting model is to adjust the offered recommendation of policy for the government regarding the issue of high volatility of daily FNG prices in the future. We then offer a best-suited policy for some certain governments like Indonesia to give subsidy for targeted users in order to keep increasing their use of FNG that will expectedly affect their marketable product innovation and expansion, so economic growth in Indonesia is maintained.

Comparison of Stock Price Risk Measurement of BUMN Banks

“…Tsay (2010) tested the stationary time series data with measuring the autocorrelation function (Autocorrelation function) and partial stationary function (partial autocorrelation function), through testing the movement of the plotting data. Ambya et al (2020) in his research proves that financial time series data is classified as non-stationary data. Therefore, at this stage the non-stationary data must be transformed into a stationary form by using an approach of differencing.…”

Modelling and Forecasting Crude Oil Prices During Covid-19 Pandemic

“…In addition, Tsay (2005) tested stationary dataset by computing the autocorrelation function (ACF) and the partial autocorrelation (PACF), where a non-stationary dataset can be identified by their decay movement for any given lags. Since most of financial data series are not stationary in both the mean and variance, transformation into a stationary dataset should be done by applying the method of difference (Ambya et al, 2020). Granger and Joyeux (1980) introduced the method of differencing to transform a non-stationary time-series dataset into stationary to stabilise its mean and volatility.…”

Forecasting Model for State-Owned Bank Stock Prices During Pandemic: GARCH Model Application

“…A model of AR(4)-GARCH(1,1) is applied to forecast volatility stock prices in Indika Energy (INDI) [10]. Besides, the model also is applied to predict the prices of some commodities, for example [11] estimated the future prices of future natural gas (FNG); [12] measured the forecasted daily oil prices by modelling GARCH (1,1).…”