35th AIAA International Communications Satellite Systems Conference 2017
DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-5412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future Ku-Band Mobility Satellites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research related to the new LEO proposals is scarce and has focused on analyzing debris and impact probabilities [14,15], as well as comparing the qualities of LEO and GEO systems in serving maritime and aeronautical users [16]. In particular, Le May [14] studied the probability of collision for SpaceX and OneWeb satellites operating in the current LEO debris environment, while Foreman [15] provided several policy recommendations to address orbital debris concerns after analyzing the number of encounters between satellites and space debris.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The research related to the new LEO proposals is scarce and has focused on analyzing debris and impact probabilities [14,15], as well as comparing the qualities of LEO and GEO systems in serving maritime and aeronautical users [16]. In particular, Le May [14] studied the probability of collision for SpaceX and OneWeb satellites operating in the current LEO debris environment, while Foreman [15] provided several policy recommendations to address orbital debris concerns after analyzing the number of encounters between satellites and space debris.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Le May [14] studied the probability of collision for SpaceX and OneWeb satellites operating in the current LEO debris environment, while Foreman [15] provided several policy recommendations to address orbital debris concerns after analyzing the number of encounters between satellites and space debris. Finally, McLain [16] compared the two aforementioned systems against multiple geostationary, very-high-throughput satellites, and concluded that the latter offer a simpler, less risky, and more economical path to providing large for the aeronautical and maritime industries. This paper adopts a similar approach as Evans [10] to compare the proposals of OneWeb, Telesat, and SpaceX.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of uncertainties exist in the complex Ka-band HTS systems including signal propagation channel conditions from a user terminal to satellite, the channel noise, and the varying co-color interference (CCI) power levels. The uncertainties also differ under different system architectures or configurations [2]. They affect the system performance and are studied using probability and statistics before a complex HTS system is constructed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current HTS systems are dominantly geostationary systems for its many advantages [2]. The distinct disadvantage of a HTS system is its many co-color interferers (CCIs) resulted from the color reuse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Telesat [3]. As opposed to geostationary spacecraft, a LEO satellite cannot stay always pointed towards a fixed spot on Earth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%