Future images of data in circular economy for textiles

Advancing towards a Circular Economy in the Textile Industry

“…The orchestration of the circular economy in the textile and fashion industry to meet the challenges of the circular economy has been examined by Saccani et al [52]. Luoma et al discuss future scenarios for the use of data in the textile circular economy [53]. The issues addressed in these studies contribute to the development of solutions for the problems of the textile industry in connection with the circular economy.…”

Service trends and the forest-based sector – an analysis of wood construction, the bioeconomy and evolving product service systems

“…Changes in the markets of forest products and services are more complex when considering the impact of technology development on services. Studies on digital forest information platforms (Pynnönen et al 2021), virtual reality forest management services (Holopainen et al 2020), and the data and material flows in the forest-based industries and their customers, such as the textile industry (Luoma et al 2022), illustrate assessments of technology-enabled services and related changes in the forest-based sector. The changes related to services which are ongoing both within the forest-based sector and in the operating environment remain difficult to grasp.…”

The routledge handbook of catalysts for a sustainable circular economy

“…Typically, the CE has been studied at the societal level, although there are two exceptions. Luoma et al (2022) examined CE futures in the textile industry, and Kuzmina et al (2019) studied the fast-moving consumer goods sector. Both studies adopt a global perspective, whereas societal studies often focus on European countries.…”

“…Kaskinen and Parkkinen (2018) (2020) stated that none of their images were preferable as such; rather, a preferable image would be comprised of parts of each image. In Urashima et al (2020), Marjamaa and Mäkelä (2022), and Luoma et al (2022), one image was explicitly nominated as preferable. In addition, the promoters of preferable futures varied between the studies.…”