2003
DOI: 10.1177/0002764203255214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future Directions in Human-Animal Bond Research

Abstract: Human-animal contact can influence psychological and physiological parameters important to health and welfare; nevertheless, there has been relatively little research on the variables that influence or mediate those health consequences. In addition, little attention has been paid on how to create or alter the animal interactions for the betterment of people and their animals. The investigation can be guided by two theoretical perspectives, which make powerful but different and testable predictions: the biophil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
99
0
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
99
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that the biophilia hypothesis is difficult to test in its general form, as its definition encompasses a variety of living things. Furthermore, attitudes and practices toward animals greatly differ by culture, making it difficult to examine biological influences without much cross-cultural research (A. M. Beck & Katcher, 2003).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Therapeutic Benefits and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that the biophilia hypothesis is difficult to test in its general form, as its definition encompasses a variety of living things. Furthermore, attitudes and practices toward animals greatly differ by culture, making it difficult to examine biological influences without much cross-cultural research (A. M. Beck & Katcher, 2003).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Therapeutic Benefits and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking back at previous studies showing that communications skills can be improved by attending EASW (Beck & Katcher, 2003;Bizub et al, 2003;Burgon, 2003;Macauley & Gutierrez, 2004) as well as being absent from it (Pauw, 2000), the study results could shed some light over that discrepancy. The communication decreases among clients and increases among staff when the focus in the interaction is on performing and the horse are regarded as an object.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Despite a lack of acknowledgement of animals in studies of therapeutic spaces, there is a wide body of literature (much of it admittedly outside of geographical scholarship) which has catalogued the health benefits which nonhumans can effect for humans, leading Beck and Katcher (2003) (Berget and Braastad 2008). Human-animal interaction has been shown to have a range of positive influences on varying groups of humans: reduced autistic symptoms, improved self-esteem, reduced loneliness and increased interaction in social situations to more physiological changes such as improved motor skills, reduced anxiety and reduced blood pressure (Odendaal 2000;Urbanik 2012).…”
Section: Therapeutic Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%