2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0160-4120(02)00187-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future directions in air quality research: economic issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the actual economic costs of O 3 ‐induced crop losses are difficult to assess, the total benefits resulting from various regulatory scenarios, mostly involving reductions of current ambient levels, ranged from about 0.1–2.5 B$ (in 1980 US dollars) in the United States (Adams & Horst 2003). Additionally, the US Environmental Protection Agency in its 1996 criteria document estimated annual national level losses to major crops to be in excess of 1 B$ (in 1990 US dollars) (US Environmental Protection Agency 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the actual economic costs of O 3 ‐induced crop losses are difficult to assess, the total benefits resulting from various regulatory scenarios, mostly involving reductions of current ambient levels, ranged from about 0.1–2.5 B$ (in 1980 US dollars) in the United States (Adams & Horst 2003). Additionally, the US Environmental Protection Agency in its 1996 criteria document estimated annual national level losses to major crops to be in excess of 1 B$ (in 1990 US dollars) (US Environmental Protection Agency 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ozone is highly phytotoxic. It inhibits photosynthesis and other physiological processes, causing significant growth and yield losses in soybean, cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), and other crops, resulting in significant economic losses (Mauzerall & Wang, 2001; Adams & Horst, 2003). Tropospheric O 3 concentrations are projected to increase in future years as emissions of its precursors continue to grow (Prather et al ., 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elevated atmospheric CO 2 is associated with the stimulation of plant photosynthesis and growth (Kimball et al 2002), while elevated O 3 inhibits plant photosynthesis and other physiological processes, causing significant growth-and yield losses (Mauzerall and Wang 2001;Adams and Horst 2003;Mills et al 2007). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%