2014
DOI: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.1.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future Bearing Surfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract: One of the most important issues in the modern total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the bearing surface. Extensive research on bearing surfaces is being conducted to seek an ideal bearing surface for THA. The ideal bearing surface for THA should have superior wear characteristics and should be durable, bio-inert, cost-effective, and easy to implant. However, bearing surfaces that are currently being implemented do not completely fulfill these requirements, especially for young individuals for whom implant longevity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7,11 In theory, blood metal ion levels should be lower than with MoM bearings and there are also unsubstantiated claims of reduced squeaking compared with CoC. 12 Finally, metal liners can be made less thick than ceramic liners, allowing larger head sizes to be used; for instance, with the Pinnacle system (DePuy Synthes, Leeds, United Kingdom) it is possible to use a 36 mm head with a 50 mm acetabular component, whereas with a ceramic liner it is only available with a 52 mm implant. It was these theoretical advantages that prompted us to start using a CoM bearing in 2007.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,11 In theory, blood metal ion levels should be lower than with MoM bearings and there are also unsubstantiated claims of reduced squeaking compared with CoC. 12 Finally, metal liners can be made less thick than ceramic liners, allowing larger head sizes to be used; for instance, with the Pinnacle system (DePuy Synthes, Leeds, United Kingdom) it is possible to use a 36 mm head with a 50 mm acetabular component, whereas with a ceramic liner it is only available with a 52 mm implant. It was these theoretical advantages that prompted us to start using a CoM bearing in 2007.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5C), co pozwoli przezwyciężyć szereg problemów związanych z długotrwałą eksploatacją protezy, takich jak: powstawanie drobnych odłamków powodujących ból stawów, osteolizę oraz obluzowanie implantu [150]. Stwierdzono również, że nanodiamentowe powłoki poprawiają odporność implantów na zużycie i zapobiegają uwalnianiu jonów metali z implantów kolan, bioder, stawu skroniowo-żuchwowego, implantów dentystycznych oraz stentów naczyniowych [151][152][153][154][155]. Duży stosunek powierzchni do objętości oraz obecność licznych reaktywnych grup funkcyjnych na powierzchni NDs sprawia, że nanocząsteczki te jako składniki polimerów i wielofunkcyjnych nanokompozytów, poprawiają ich biokompatybilność, właściwości mechaniczne oraz biomimetyczne naśladując hierarchiczną architekturę natywnej tkanki [3, 20,38].…”
Section: Wykorzystanie Nanodiamentów W Inżynierii Tkankowejunclassified
“…Examples include vitamin E reinforcement of material surfaces, the use of “diamond-like” carbon and titanium nitride coatings, and the addition of cushion bearings (e.g. polyurethane, hydrogels) (72, 73). Hip and knee prostheses are exposed to substantial stress with ambulation as compared to small joint implants for the hand.…”
Section: Advances In Small Joint Arthroplasty Of the Handmentioning
confidence: 99%