2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-018-4676-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Futility of attempts to detect and quantify beta cells by PET imaging in the pancreas: why it is time to abandon the approach

Abstract: In this commentary, we describe the limitations of positron emission tomography (PET) in visualising and characterising beta cell mass in the native pancreas in healthy individuals and those diagnosed with diabetes. Imaging with PET requires a large mass of targeted cells or other structures in the range of approximately 8-10 cm. Since islets occupy only 1% of the pancreatic volume and are dispersed throughout the organ, it is our view that uptake of PET tracers, including [F]fluoropropyl-(+)-dihydrotetrabenaz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to analyzing human b cells ex vivo, there is great need to identify and visualize b cells non-invasively in vivo. Although reduced b cell mass is an accepted feature of diabetes progression, current knowledge has originated from postmortem analysis since there are no effective methods to quantify b cell mass non-invasively in humans (Alavi and Werner, 2018;Laurent et al, 2015). This limitation has greatly hindered our understanding of disease risk and progression and prevents the evaluation of interventions designed to preserve or increase b cell mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to analyzing human b cells ex vivo, there is great need to identify and visualize b cells non-invasively in vivo. Although reduced b cell mass is an accepted feature of diabetes progression, current knowledge has originated from postmortem analysis since there are no effective methods to quantify b cell mass non-invasively in humans (Alavi and Werner, 2018;Laurent et al, 2015). This limitation has greatly hindered our understanding of disease risk and progression and prevents the evaluation of interventions designed to preserve or increase b cell mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, clinical studies of BCM are currently limited to cross-sectional studies in which the pancreas is obtained from autopsy or operation. Although there are a few arguments regarding the feasibility of the clinical implementation on BCM quantification (9)(10)(11)(12)(13), the study of how BCM changes over time would provide a deeper understanding of the pathophysiology of diabetes and could be used to develop a scale to evaluate the efficacy of antidiabetic drugs in preserving or increasing BCM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of radiolabeled PET/SPECT-based probes for BCM quantification is a contentious field, with concerns that relatively poor spatial resolution is a substantial limitation for accurate b-cell imaging. Since exocrine pancreas also expresses GLP-1R, PET/SPECT cannot distinguish whether the radioactivity is originating from b-cells or exocrine cells, thereby skewing the accuracy of BCM quantification (36,37). However, as Gotthardt et al pointed out, the key influencing factor for successful b-cell quantification using PET is not spatial resolution but ensuring that the radioactive signal observed is exclusively from b-cells (38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%