2011
DOI: 10.4172/2165-7939.1000103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion Status and Clinical Outcomes at One Year and Two Years of Instrumented, Local Bone Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These patients were divided into 2 separate cohorts—according to time after surgery—6 and 12 months. A period of 6 months was chosen as this is a common short-term follow-up period used in comparable TLIF studies 2 , 12 ; 12 months was chosen because it is widely accepted as the cutoff when patients can be considered to have achieved fusion or not. Indications for surgery included diagnoses of spondylolisthesis, recurrent herniated disc, degenerative disc disease, or spinal stenosis.…”
Section: Clinical Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients were divided into 2 separate cohorts—according to time after surgery—6 and 12 months. A period of 6 months was chosen as this is a common short-term follow-up period used in comparable TLIF studies 2 , 12 ; 12 months was chosen because it is widely accepted as the cutoff when patients can be considered to have achieved fusion or not. Indications for surgery included diagnoses of spondylolisthesis, recurrent herniated disc, degenerative disc disease, or spinal stenosis.…”
Section: Clinical Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%