1992
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/25/9/024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion procedure for open chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
171
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
171
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(This approach does not completely circumvent the problem of not having a reference state, since the eigenvectors are not determined.) We obtain the inversion identity using the open-chain fusion formula [16] together with the remarkable fact that, for the open XX spin chain/ 6-vertex free-Fermion model, the fused transfer matrix is proportional to the identity matrix. A similar strategy has recently been used [13] to solve the open 8-vertex free-Fermion [17] model, which corresponds to the case of N = 1 supersymmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(This approach does not completely circumvent the problem of not having a reference state, since the eigenvectors are not determined.) We obtain the inversion identity using the open-chain fusion formula [16] together with the remarkable fact that, for the open XX spin chain/ 6-vertex free-Fermion model, the fused transfer matrix is proportional to the identity matrix. A similar strategy has recently been used [13] to solve the open 8-vertex free-Fermion [17] model, which corresponds to the case of N = 1 supersymmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having defined the fused-R matrices, one can analogously construct the fused-K matrices by using the methods developed in [69,74,75] as follows. The fused K − matrices (e.g the spin-j K − matrix) is given by…”
Section: Jhep02(2015)036mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…}, i.e., each of the N quantum spaces is described by a spin S ((2s + 1)-dimensional). The fused transfer matrices {t (j,s) (u)} given by (2.23) obey the following fusion hierarchy relation [52,69,74,75] …”
Section: Operator Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, we need to use the fusion techniques both for R-matrices [65][66][67][68][69] and for K-matrices [75,76]. We only consider the antisymmetric fusion procedure which leads to the desired operator identities to determine the spectrum of the transfer matrix t(u) given by (3.5).…”
Section: Operator Product Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We only consider the antisymmetric fusion procedure which leads to the desired operator identities to determine the spectrum of the transfer matrix t(u) given by (3.5). Following [75,76], let us introduce the fused K-matrices and double-row monodromy matrices by the following recursive relations…”
Section: Operator Product Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%