2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion of Strengths: T-style Thinkers are the Soul Savers for Organizational Innovative Drives and the Allied Change Processes

Abstract: Though almost all the organizations of the current era espouse innovation and creativity, but still there is strong practical presence of management models supporting the concepts like maximization, equilibrium and rationality, the highlights of Anglo-Saxon capitalism in management thinking practices. This paper discusses the reasons for validating change in the management thinking approaches to harness organizational transformation for innovation and sustainability. The paper illustrates key stand points to e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The changing nature of individual design tasks signals that training in systems thinking and orchestration will be increasingly important to firms. This research indicates the increasing importance of this type of higher‐level thinking during the project (Karmi and Naaranoja, 2015). Our findings also show that digital tools and CIT have a direct implication on problem‐solving, technology affordances and constraints, and orchestration (Barley et al, 2017; Nambisan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The changing nature of individual design tasks signals that training in systems thinking and orchestration will be increasingly important to firms. This research indicates the increasing importance of this type of higher‐level thinking during the project (Karmi and Naaranoja, 2015). Our findings also show that digital tools and CIT have a direct implication on problem‐solving, technology affordances and constraints, and orchestration (Barley et al, 2017; Nambisan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…From the school level onwards, the policy outlines embedding critical thinking in Physics through inquiry tasks and concept mapping exercises, with summative assessments evaluating comprehension, application, and logical coherence in scientific problemsolving. University Physics courses also adopt similar learning outcomes, prioritizing evidencebased reasoning and open-ended assessments for developing intellectual independence, objectivity, and careful evaluation of multifaceted phenomena -the foundation of critical thinking (Kazmi & Naaranoja, 2015).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, to proceed further inquest of understanding strategic thinking phenomena the researcher recommends the readers to ponder upon an unusual philosophical point made by Blanchard, and Blanchard, (2013) and follow a rose gardener's approach as an example. Strategic thinking perspective supports building connections between human cognitive process with most simplified day to day examples, to comprehend the complex organizational decision making process and to support system thinking (Kazmi, and Naaranoja, 2015). According to Blanchards (2013), an everyday example of rose garden is probably visible in almost all of our neighborhoods.…”
Section: Figure 4 Strategic Thinking Process Progression From Basic T...mentioning
confidence: 99%