1979
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.20.2219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion ofNi58,60,62with 113-170 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recently performed these two reactions at INFN-Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro (LNL) in Italy. The present measurements complement earlier studies on 40 Ca + 58 Ni [29], essentially at energies above the CB, and provide a detailed picture of the influence of the projectile and target nuclear structures on the fusion cross sections in both systems.…”
Section: Introduction and Background Studiessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…We recently performed these two reactions at INFN-Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro (LNL) in Italy. The present measurements complement earlier studies on 40 Ca + 58 Ni [29], essentially at energies above the CB, and provide a detailed picture of the influence of the projectile and target nuclear structures on the fusion cross sections in both systems.…”
Section: Introduction and Background Studiessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Figure 1 shows the measured reduced excitations functions for the 40 Ca + 58,64 Ni systems. The previous Sikora results for the 40 Ca + 58 Ni [9] system are also reported, in good agreement for the present measurement, except the last Sikora point, which should be noted is affected by 50 % error bar. The trend at low energies for the reduced 40 Ca + 64 Ni cross-section shows a different behavior, which is a first indication that some physics may be different for this system.…”
Section: Previous Results Concerning the Ca+ca And Ni+ni Systemssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…All structure characteristics of the target and projectile have been taken into account and we have shown that it is necessary to include transfer channels effects to reproduce the 40 Ca + 48 Ca data. Interestingly enough, Q values for the +2n, +3n and +4n transfer channels (from 48 What the Ca+Ni systems are concerned, in previous pionneering work by Sikora et al [9], more than 30 years ago, fusion excitation functions for 40 Ca + 58 Ni have been measured at energies above the barrier ranging from E lab = 113 to 170 MeV to extract information on the potentials and eventual neutron effecs. To our knowledge, this is the only published fusion excitation function result for the Ca+Ni systems.…”
Section: Previous Results Concerning the Ca+ca And Ni+ni Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fusion above the classical barrier is reasonably well described by conventional one-dimensional fusion models using conservative nucleus-nucleus potentials [87], However, from recent experiments [88][89][90][91] The solid curve is a transmission calculation (WKB) using a proximity potential and assuming rigid sphercity for both target and projectile. The conventional fusion barrier is indicated by the arrow fusion well below the barrier (involving the quantum-mechanical penetration of the fusion barrier) cannot be described with such one-dimensional models of colliding rigid spheres involving WKB theory or the Hill-Wheeler expression for the transmission through a potential barrier.…”
Section: Coldfusion Through Barrier Penetrationmentioning
confidence: 99%