2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12571-017-0663-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion of indigenous knowledge and gamma spectrometry for soil mapping to support knowledge-based extension in Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gamma‐ray measurements, thus, can help to differentiate between bedrock and soil, and detect weathering intensity, textural properties, and nutrient status of the latter ( Cook et al, ). Gamma‐ray spectrometry has emerged as a helpful tool for rapid soil mapping ( Schuler et al, ), soil map refinement ( Reinhardt and Herrmann , ), soil characterization ( Beamish , ), and precision farming ( Van Egmond et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gamma‐ray measurements, thus, can help to differentiate between bedrock and soil, and detect weathering intensity, textural properties, and nutrient status of the latter ( Cook et al, ). Gamma‐ray spectrometry has emerged as a helpful tool for rapid soil mapping ( Schuler et al, ), soil map refinement ( Reinhardt and Herrmann , ), soil characterization ( Beamish , ), and precision farming ( Van Egmond et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gammaray spectrometry can add soil information to other covariate data layers like parent rock or topography as used in digital soil mapping (Bierwirth, 1996;Dickson and Scott, 1997;Taylor et al, 2002). Combination with other (3D-)methods like electromagnetic measurements (Hyvö nen et al, 2005) but also participatory mapping (Reinhardt and Herrmann, 2017) make gamma-ray spectrometry even more expedient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since yield variability is highly influenced by the soil properties, we used a local soil map and underlying data from the physical and chemical properties of the soil [26]. In general, the farmers' soils matched with respect to classification and fertility but were noticeably different in terms of texture with predominantly higher sand content [26]. As shown in the soil map ( Figure 2), these soils were chromic lixisol loamic (CLL), chromic lixisol hypereutric (CLH), chromic lixisol (CL), haplic acrisol loamic (HA), and sodic vertisol hypereutric (SVH).…”
Section: Soil Physical and Chemical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are found to contain a low total nitrogen (%) mean of 0.04 ± 0.02, mean pH (H2O) of 6.7 ± 0.9, and a low mean soil organic matter (%) of 0.74 ± 0.35 (mean ± S.D). As shown in Figure 1, soil groups (according to different groups of the World Reference Base (WRB) Soil Groups [25]) varied across the village. Figure 1.…”
Section: Study Area Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daily rainfall data were collected using manual rain gauges, as explained by [10]. Topsoil characteristics for the area were analysed for physical and chemical properties, with average values and details provided in a previous study [25]. The planting dates and grain yield data during each season were collected by farmers under the close supervision of an agricultural field officer.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%