1999
DOI: 10.1117/12.341335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion of imaging and nonimaging sensor information for airborne surveillance

Abstract: This paper presents results from an Adaptable Data Fusion Testbed (ADFT) which has been constructed to analyze simulated or real data with the help of modular algorithms for each of the main fusion functions and image interpretation algorithms. The results obtained from data fusion of information coming from an imaging Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and non-imaging sensors (ESM, 1FF, 2-D radar) on-board an airborne maritime surveillance platform are presented for two typical scenarios of Maritime Air Area Oper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are further detailed in the sub-sections below as well as in [4][5][6]. 1. maximum acceleration, both tangential (if available for aircraft, it denotes the likely presence of afterburners) and centrifugal (with higher g values likely denoting a fighter aircraft), 2. maximum platform speed (the quoted value is relevant to static ambient atmosphere and must be interpreted, or fuzzified, to account for air currents, particularly when the aircraft can reach the jet stream), 3. minimum platform speed, e.g.…”
Section: Attribute Information From Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are further detailed in the sub-sections below as well as in [4][5][6]. 1. maximum acceleration, both tangential (if available for aircraft, it denotes the likely presence of afterburners) and centrifugal (with higher g values likely denoting a fighter aircraft), 2. maximum platform speed (the quoted value is relevant to static ambient atmosphere and must be interpreted, or fuzzified, to account for air currents, particularly when the aircraft can reach the jet stream), 3. minimum platform speed, e.g.…”
Section: Attribute Information From Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The term 'soft' is used by fusion analysts to mean estimates on the confidence in declaring a target to be of a specific type and/or other types, rather than simply a 'hard' declaration without an associated confidence measure. 3 We considered the use of two archives -one for storing the latest 'fused' results on a target and a second for storing all incoming sensor reports in case one needs to disregard reports generated by a particular source at a later time. This would accommodate cases when a source is later known to provide bad information, and hence allow fusion of results omitting the faulty data.…”
Section: Overview Of Multisensor Fusion Mands In the Tped Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate target tracking and ID results [45] for decision support requires efforts in fusing imaging and non-imaging data [46,47], understanding the user's needs [48], the theoretical and knowledge models [49], and situational awareness processing techniques [50]. In a dynamic scenario, resource coordination [51] is needed for both context assessment, but also the ability to be aware of impending situational threats [52,53].…”
Section: Information Fusion Decision Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%