2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion of feature sets and classifiers for facial expression recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thiago et al utilize Gabor and LBP as feature descriptors. Their experiments on the Cohn-Kanade and Japanese Female Facial Expression (JAFFE) datasets showed that the recognition rate with multiple features and classifiers is 10% and 5% above that with a single feature and classifier respectively [26]. Koelstra et al propose a dynamic texture-based approach based on facial Action Units (AUs).…”
Section: Fusion Strategy For Facial Expression Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thiago et al utilize Gabor and LBP as feature descriptors. Their experiments on the Cohn-Kanade and Japanese Female Facial Expression (JAFFE) datasets showed that the recognition rate with multiple features and classifiers is 10% and 5% above that with a single feature and classifier respectively [26]. Koelstra et al propose a dynamic texture-based approach based on facial Action Units (AUs).…”
Section: Fusion Strategy For Facial Expression Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy rate achieved in our proposed approach is highlighted in bold. [39] 88.9% Boosted-LBP + SVM Thiago et al (2013) [26] 88.9% Ensemble Gabor and LBP Xu et al (2009) [40] 89.1% ASM + geometry feature + LSVM classifier Jia et al (2013) [29] 90.7% Dynamic geometry feature + stacking Tian Y et al (2002) [3] 92.7% Gabor wavelets + geometry with FACS Chen-Chiung Hsieh et al (2016) [31] 94.7% dynamic face regions + A multi-class SVM Deepak Ghimire et al (2013) [23] 95.17% Feature selective multi-class AdaBoost Our proposed approach 96.62% Multi-layer of optimally weighted AU Ping et al (2014) [41] 96.7% Boosted deep belief network Deepak Ghimire et al (2013) [23] 97.35% SVM on boosted features The results in Tables 11 and 12 show that our proposed fusion method outperforms the others in both CK and JAFFE datasets. Comparing with the deep belief network of Ping et al [41], our proposed method achieves a comparative recognition rate only 0.1% less than the current prevalent deep learning based method.…”
Section: Comparison With Several State-of-the-art Expression Recognitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming to describe the different expressions more effectively, diverse features extracted methods are used in facial expression recognition. Typical hand-crafted features include Local Binary Patterns (LBP) [4],Histogram of Oriented Gradient (HOG) [8], Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) [16], and the fusion of these features [7]. According to these literature, the fusion features contain more information about these expressions and achieve better results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likes other recognition research, facial expressions recognition uses data from videos, images sequences [6] and static images [3,7]. Whole movement processes of the expressions are applied in the researches which use videos and images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processing the images that obtained from the videos has been used in different applications such as surveillance, action recognition, tracking, face detection and emotion recognition [4,5]. Due to the emergence of advantaged technologies, these applications are integrated with some electronic devices for sharing the mood and perception of people [6]. So, the analysis of people's mood detection is a main role in video processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%