2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88693-8_64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion of Feature- and Area-Based Information for Urban Buildings Modeling from Aerial Imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interpolation leads to a much denser distribution of points such that not only better and more stable results can be obtained by using previously described methods but also image processing methods can be applied directly to the image that is given by the height map. This fits with a result of (Zebedin et al, 2008) that region growing leads to good results on dense height data obtained from areal images.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interpolation leads to a much denser distribution of points such that not only better and more stable results can be obtained by using previously described methods but also image processing methods can be applied directly to the image that is given by the height map. This fits with a result of (Zebedin et al, 2008) that region growing leads to good results on dense height data obtained from areal images.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A further improvement would be to extend roof facets to areas outside the ground plan according to LiDAR data. On the other hand side, as shown in (Zebedin et al, 2008), instead of just applying a Ramer-DouglasPeucker-type algorithm to simplify polygons locally, it is pos- Figure 16: Trees around the left church lead to three small towers at corners of the building. Because of the same reason, the right church has an error at the left front side.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, our algorithm works directly on raw 3D points without using highlevel geometric primitives, and is also more flexible with viewing angle (so long as parallax is observed). Results in Section 4 show that, without post processing, our pointbased algorithm achieves a comparable level of smoothness to the results reported in [30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…While a large number of existing approaches formulate 3D reconstruction as an MRF solved with graph cuts [23,10,15,29,30], MRF-based methods typically deal with a much smaller set of output 3D points (typically tens of thousands) and a smaller input image size (a few hundred by a few hundred). In our case, we generate an output dense cloud of many millions of 3D points, based on input images of a large size (1000 × 1000).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation