1999
DOI: 10.1109/36.763293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion of airborne polarimetric and interferometric SAR for classification of coastal environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Selective Principal Component-Synthetic Aperature Radar (SPC-SAR) product was used to fuse Landsat TM bands with fine mode radar data, represented through the Intensity-Hue-Saturation color transform. Other studies have utilized data fusion to examine landcover and topographic features (e.g., Crawford et al, 1999), and this approach has great potential, as information from existing and new sensors and GIS databases can be combined to facilitate DGM.…”
Section: Data Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Selective Principal Component-Synthetic Aperature Radar (SPC-SAR) product was used to fuse Landsat TM bands with fine mode radar data, represented through the Intensity-Hue-Saturation color transform. Other studies have utilized data fusion to examine landcover and topographic features (e.g., Crawford et al, 1999), and this approach has great potential, as information from existing and new sensors and GIS databases can be combined to facilitate DGM.…”
Section: Data Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both these algorithms were used in a pair wise classifier framework where the original C class problem was divided into a 2 class problem. Bayesian pair wise classifier framework [18], [19] as shown in Fig. 3 was used to decompose a C class problem into a set of 2 class problem for all pairs (wi,wj), 1<i<j<C .…”
Section: Classification Techniques Used In Hyperspectral Images 21bamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the high dimensionality of the data is problematic for supervised statistical classification techniques that utilize the estimated covariance matrix since the number of known samples is typically small relative to the dimension of the data [1]. Previous research has dealt with this problem using a) regularization methods to stabilize the estimated covariance matrix directly or by using the pseudo-inverse [2,3], b) transformation of the input space via reduction in the dimension of the feature space via feature extraction or selection [4,5] or addition of artificially labeled data [6,7], and c) utilization of ensembles of classifiers (e.g. bagging, simple random sub-sampling, arcing) [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%