2011
DOI: 10.4171/qt/24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion categories in terms of graphs and relations

Abstract: Every fusion category C that is k-linear over a suitable field k, is the category of finite-dimensional comodules of a Weak Hopf Algebra H. This Weak Hopf Algebra is finite-dimensional, cosemisimple and has commutative bases. It arises as the universal coend with respect to the long canonical functor ω : C → Vect k . We show that H is a quotient H = H[G]/I of a Weak Bialgebra H[G] which has a combinatorial description in terms of a finite directed graph G that depends on the choice of a generator M of C and on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us call them SL q (2), depending on the root of unity q. In [7], we have constructed a WBA H with a central group-like element det q in such a way that SL q (2) agrees with the quotient of H modulo the relation det q = 1. Let us call this WBA H = M q (2) in analogy with Example 4.1.…”
Section: Weak Bialgebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Let us call them SL q (2), depending on the root of unity q. In [7], we have constructed a WBA H with a central group-like element det q in such a way that SL q (2) agrees with the quotient of H modulo the relation det q = 1. Let us call this WBA H = M q (2) in analogy with Example 4.1.…”
Section: Weak Bialgebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This WBA is new and is presented here for the first time. Let us begin by describing M q (2) following [7]. Example 4.6.…”
Section: Weak Bialgebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main idea of the proof is to consider the Kronecker square Q of the quiver Q [Definition 3.1], and realize H(Q) as the path algebra k Q [Proposition 3.4] (see also [Pfe11,Remark 3.3]). Then, the theorem above follows from (i) prior results on relating algebraic properties of a path algebra with graph-theoretic properties of the underlying quiver [Proposition 2.5] and (ii) a careful analysis of graph-theoretic properties that are shared between a quiver and its Kronecker square [Proposition 3.2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%