2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.116486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion bonding of copper and silicon at -70 °C by electrochemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[42][43][44] Those reactions allow the formation of both Si 0 (defect) and Cu 0 at the CuÀ Si interface with the presence of photogenerated electron caused by the illumination of Si. Accordingly, this mechanism facilitates the dynamic addition/elimination of lattice oxygen on both Cu nanocrystals and BSi surface to generate additional structural defects, which could further enhance atomic mobility and promote the mutual interdiffusion between Cu and Si atoms through an interstitial mechanism, [45][46] resulting in the formation of an irreversible silicide (i.e., Cu 3 Si phase).…”
Section: Correlation Between Proposed Atomic Interdiffusion and Produ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42][43][44] Those reactions allow the formation of both Si 0 (defect) and Cu 0 at the CuÀ Si interface with the presence of photogenerated electron caused by the illumination of Si. Accordingly, this mechanism facilitates the dynamic addition/elimination of lattice oxygen on both Cu nanocrystals and BSi surface to generate additional structural defects, which could further enhance atomic mobility and promote the mutual interdiffusion between Cu and Si atoms through an interstitial mechanism, [45][46] resulting in the formation of an irreversible silicide (i.e., Cu 3 Si phase).…”
Section: Correlation Between Proposed Atomic Interdiffusion and Produ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the day, a common strategy to achieve low-temperature/cryogenic conditions remains to immerse conventional test cells in slush/cooling baths consisting of dry ice mixed with organic solvents [15][16][17], allowing for temperatures as low as À 78 °C [12,13,18]. Drawbacks of such immersion techniques are evident: An accurate temperature conditioning/regulation of the electrolyte solution inside the test cell is missing, particularly problematic during long-term measurement sessions [13,17]. As temperatures cannot be changed intentionally, a variation requires discontinuous manipulations of the bath [19,20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%