2015
DOI: 10.21307/ijssis-2017-799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion Algorithm OF Optical Images and SAR With SVT and Sparse Representation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hybrid methods combine component substitution methods and multi-scale decomposition methods, such as IHS combined with à Trous wavelet (AWT) [19] and PCA combined with AWT [20], which make full use of the advantages of the two methods. Model-based methods have two types: variational models [21] and sparse representation-based models [22]. Reviews of optical and SAR images fusion can be found in [4,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid methods combine component substitution methods and multi-scale decomposition methods, such as IHS combined with à Trous wavelet (AWT) [19] and PCA combined with AWT [20], which make full use of the advantages of the two methods. Model-based methods have two types: variational models [21] and sparse representation-based models [22]. Reviews of optical and SAR images fusion can be found in [4,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Ahmed et al 2013) used Vegetation indices (optical),Global Environment Monitoring Index GEMI ,Purified Adjusted Vegetation Index PAVI and polarimetric indices SAR (CPR, HV/HH and HV/VV) to detect the subsurface hotspots. The third part of pixel level is two articles based on Hierarchical Markov Random Fields models (Hedhli et al 2015(Hedhli et al , 2017, and finally nine papers applied others different methods including layer stacking (Sameen et al 2016), Genetic algorithm image fusion technique (Ahmed et al 2016), multi-scale decomposition and sparse representation (Zhouping 2015), the combination method band 3, band 7 of Landsat ETM+ with a modified HH polarization of SAR image (Xiao et al 2014) , Closest Spectral Fit (CSF) algorithm with the synergistic application of multi-spectral satellite images and multi-frequency Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data. (Eckardt et al 2013), applied learning Artificial Neural Network at pixel level ANN (Piscini et al 2017), these three typical manifold learning ; ISOMAP, Local Linear Embedding (LLE), principle component analysis (PCA) and two papers the first are not clear and the last without fusion method.…”
Section: Figure 4: Types Of Combinations Of Satellite Images Used In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paper [13] proposed automated image mosaicking method based on SFM was proposed in, calculating the camera parameters and 3D coordinates of feature points on basis of a set of preprocessing. In paper [14], a fusion algorithm of SAR and optical image with fast sparse representation on low-frequency images was proposed, and a sparse decomposition process is improved to reduce the algorithm running time. Paper [15] proposed an approach based on structure deformation and propagation for achieving the overall consistency in image structure and intensity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%