2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusing damage-sensitive features and domain adaptation towards robust damage classification in real buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the common system identification in terms of frequencies, modal shapes and damping ratios, transmissibility-based features, as elaborated in [25] will be investigated during the tests and implemented in the damage detection tool. The Transmissibility Assurance Criterion (TAC), which is based on the cross-spectral density between two points, whose response is recorded by accelerometers, as indicated in [13], can be used to evaluate the fitting degree between healthy and investigated (possibly damaged) state in a predefined frequency range. As long as the system remains elastic, they present a strong fitting, whereas in occurrence of damage the deviation increases.…”
Section: Damage Sensitive Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apart from the common system identification in terms of frequencies, modal shapes and damping ratios, transmissibility-based features, as elaborated in [25] will be investigated during the tests and implemented in the damage detection tool. The Transmissibility Assurance Criterion (TAC), which is based on the cross-spectral density between two points, whose response is recorded by accelerometers, as indicated in [13], can be used to evaluate the fitting degree between healthy and investigated (possibly damaged) state in a predefined frequency range. As long as the system remains elastic, they present a strong fitting, whereas in occurrence of damage the deviation increases.…”
Section: Damage Sensitive Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latest years, there is an increasing tendency to complete the traditional vibration-based methods with the use of machine learning (ML) applications [12]. This enables the training of different damage-sensitive indicators as classifiers to indicate the presence, location, and severity of structural damage [13] [14]. Within this approach many indicators can be weighted properly, after a training process and result in a multi-parametric identification process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy to mention the recent research contributions of Reuland et al [21], who conducted an extensive review of data-driven damage indicators for rapid seismic structural health monitoring. Additionally, Martakis et al [22] explored the integration of traditional structural health monitoring techniques with innovative machine learning tools, offering a comprehensive perspective. Moreover, [23,24] provide an extensive review of available methods and case studies related to damage identification in bridge structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to quantify the value of information extracted from a SHM system to implement it in a decisionmaking tool, studies were conducted by [19], in which a heuristic model was used for life-cycle optimization by the sequential updating of structural reliability based on the identification of deterioration and the estimation of its evolution using a classical Bayesian model updating method. In [20], a framework is proposed to transfer knowledge obtained through synthetic data creation from earthquake simulations for various damage classes to real data with exposure limited to a single health state via a domain adversarial neural network (DANN) architecture. Again, to overcome the limitations imposed by knowledge of the goodness-of-fit class data set alone, the authors of [21] developed a vibrationbased SHM framework for damage classification in structural systems to overcome this limitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%