2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-015-1539-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusarium head blight resistance loci in a stratified population of wheat landraces and varieties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most QTL identified for FHB resistance on chromosome 5B were identified on the long arm, particularly for INC (Hu et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2009; Yu et al., 2008). The only novel QTL for FHB resistance on 5BS was identified in an AMP of Chinese and Japanese landraces, and it was associated with SEV (Li et al., 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most QTL identified for FHB resistance on chromosome 5B were identified on the long arm, particularly for INC (Hu et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2009; Yu et al., 2008). The only novel QTL for FHB resistance on 5BS was identified in an AMP of Chinese and Japanese landraces, and it was associated with SEV (Li et al., 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Sumai 3 has been extensively used in North America, other regions are either relying on different sources of Fhb1 such as Shinchunaga in Japan and Norin 129 and Nigmai 9 in China or even dropping Fhb1 due to preferential selection for the stem rust gene Sr2 in International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) as both of these genes are linked in repulsion (Buerstmayr et al, 2019). Besides Sumai 3, novel sources of FHB resistance from several other Asian cultivars or landraces such as Chokwang conferring type II resistance from Korea and Wangshuibai, Nyu-Bai and Nobeokabozu and their descendants CM-82036 and Ning7840 from China are widely used in US wheat breeding programs (Yang et al, 2005;Buerstmayr et al, 2009;Buerstmayr et al, 2014;Li et al, 2016b;Buerstmayr et al, 2019). Before the introduction of Sumai 3, US wheat breeding programs primarily used type I resistance sourced from Brazilian donor cultivar Frontana with stable QTL reported on chromosomes 3AL and 5A (Steiner et al, 2004;Buerstmayr et al, 2009).…”
Section: Exotic and Alien Sources Of Fhb Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although complete FHB resistance has not been obtained yet ( Steiner et al, 2017 ), identification and validation of major and minor effect QTLs and their introgression through diverse breeding methodologies including recently implemented methods such as marker-assisted and genomic selections are of paramount important. These methods have allowed gene pyramiding for durable resistance across wheat breeding programs ( Buerstmayr et al, 2009 ; Li et al, 2016b ; Shah et al, 2017 ; Zhao et al, 2018 ; Zhu et al, 2019 ). Meanwhile, the catastrophic epidemics in the 1990s resulted in the initiation of the US wheat and barley scab initiative (USWBSI; ) in 1997 ( McMullen et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Epidemiology and Management Of Fhbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fhb2 from Sumai 3 ( Yang et al, 2006 ; Lu et al, 2010 ) and Fhb7 ( Guo et al, 2015 ) from Thinopyrum ponticum have also been used by resistance breeding programs. However, it is still a formidable challenge to transfer resistance genes into susceptible cultivars because major sources of resistance (such as Sumai 3 and Wangshuibai) also carry undesirable agronomic traits ( Dvorjak, 2014 ; Li et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%