1971
DOI: 10.2307/2329717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Tests of the Validity of the Industry Approach to Investment Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were confirmed in Brigham and Pappas [3], in Reilly and Drzycimski for different types of market periods (rising and declining) [25], and also by Tysseland [27]. Such findings make the job of the industry analyst much more difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results were confirmed in Brigham and Pappas [3], in Reilly and Drzycimski for different types of market periods (rising and declining) [25], and also by Tysseland [27]. Such findings make the job of the industry analyst much more difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Cheney examined numerous stocks in a selected number of industries and concluded that there was substantial dispersion within alternative industries [5]. These results were supported by statements in the Brigham and Pappas study (31, and also by the Tysseland analysis [27]. This intra-industry dispersion means that firm analysis is necessary after industry analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Thus, it is worthwhile for investors exploring different industries likely to perform well in the future. As regards a question of the consistency of industries performance over time, Mel Tysseland (1971) has not found the conclusive evidence on the consistent time-series performance for selected industries. Reilly and Drzycimski (1974) re-examined the issue of performance persistence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%