1990
DOI: 10.1017/s0950268800047440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further studies on the inhibition of colonization of the chicken alimentary tract withSalmonella typhimuriumby pre–colonization with an avirulent mutant

Abstract: SUMMARYOral administration to newly hatched chickens or to chicks up to 5 days of age with an avirulent, rough, spectinomycin-resistant mutant of Salmonella typhimurium strain F98 inhibited the colonization of a nalidixic acid-resistant mutant of the same strain administered by the same route 1 day later. The second strain passed rapidly through the alimentary tract and persisted in the caeca of only a few chickens. Resistance to colonization did not develop until 24 h after inoculation of the first strain but… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has recently been proposed that the eradication of S. Gallinarum opened an ecological niche, which allowed the introduction of S. Enteritidis into poultry flocks [12]. Because the immunodominant epitope of the lipopolysaccharide of S. Gallinarum and S. Enteritidis is the O9-antigen, mathematical models predict that the coexistence of these two serotypes would prompt competition where the more transmissible bacterium will eliminate the other from the host population [62], either as a result of adaptive immunity, or as a result of microbial competition, which is also partially clonal at the level of the serotype [14]. S. Gallinarum may have generated immunity at the flock level against the O9-serotype, thereby excluding S. Enteritidis from poultry flocks [126].…”
Section: Eradication Of S Gallinarummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has recently been proposed that the eradication of S. Gallinarum opened an ecological niche, which allowed the introduction of S. Enteritidis into poultry flocks [12]. Because the immunodominant epitope of the lipopolysaccharide of S. Gallinarum and S. Enteritidis is the O9-antigen, mathematical models predict that the coexistence of these two serotypes would prompt competition where the more transmissible bacterium will eliminate the other from the host population [62], either as a result of adaptive immunity, or as a result of microbial competition, which is also partially clonal at the level of the serotype [14]. S. Gallinarum may have generated immunity at the flock level against the O9-serotype, thereby excluding S. Enteritidis from poultry flocks [126].…”
Section: Eradication Of S Gallinarummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon has been termed "competitive exclusion," and its discovery has led to a search for individual strains of bacteria which can inhibit colonization by pathogens to the same extent as the normal flora. Oral administration of an avirulent Salmonella typhimurium strain to day-old chicks can confer protection against oral infection by a virulent strain (known as colonization inhibition) (8,10). Colonization inhibition is normally genus specific, is not caused by bacteriophage or bacteriocin activity, and is not a consequence of immunity induced by the first strain (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For studying the behavior of the avian strain S. typhimurium F98 (3,4,10) in mixed cultures and in vivo, nalidixic acid-or spectinomycinresistant mutants (30) were used for ease of enumeration. These resistance determinants do not affect growth suppression or colonization inhibition (8,10,11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the ability of Salmonella strains to colonise represents an important prerequisite for effective colonisation inhibition of wildtype strains, persistence of a CI strain and protection offered by a CI strain are probably related to each other. Furthermore, it has been suggested that a CI strain is more protective against challenge when it is highly colonising [16,25]. It is therefore not improbable that the observed strong protective effect of the Salmonella Typhimurium hilAssrAfliG strain is due to its high colonising capacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%