2016
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2015.2502399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Results on the Achievable Delay Margin Using LTI Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the analysis in [22] was carried out largely case by case, and for this reason, its technique does not appear readily generalizable. The same can be said of the improvement in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the analysis in [22] was carried out largely case by case, and for this reason, its technique does not appear readily generalizable. The same can be said of the improvement in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…which gives rise to (13). The remaining results then follow by solving the polynomials in question explicitly.…”
Section: B Special Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [2] (p. 154), the delay margin was examined for the first-order system with a constant delay stabilized by static feedback, while in [15], the stabilization was achieved by using PID controllers for first-order systems. Furthermore, for single-input single-output (SISO) systems with constant delays, the upper bound was determined in [16,17] for general LTI systems with an arbitrary number of unstable poles. These bounds consequently provide a limit beyond which no single LTI output feedback controller may exist to robustly stabilize a delay plant family within the delay margin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%