2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/657621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Result on Passivity for Discrete-Time Stochastic T-S Fuzzy Systems with Time-Varying Delays

Abstract: The passivity for discrete-time stochastic T-S fuzzy systems with time-varying delays is investigated. By constructing appropriate Lyapunov-Krasovskii functionals and employing stochastic analysis method and matrix inequality technique, a delay-dependent criterion to ensure the passivity for the considered T-S fuzzy systems is established in terms of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) that can be easily checked by using the standard numerical software. An example is given to show the effectiveness of the obtain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using Lemma 2, 𝛀 is equivalent to inequality (5), which means that ||𝑧|| 2 ≀ Ξ³||𝑀|| 2 is satisfied for any nonzero 𝑀(t) ∈ L 2 [0, ∞), which ensures the asymptotical stability of system (4). Theorem 2 For a prescribed scalar Ξ³ > 0 and some given positive scalars Ο„ m , Ο„ M , u, h and matrix K, system (4) with condition ( 2) is robustly asymptotically stable and satisfies ‖𝑧(t)β€– 2 ≀ γ‖𝑀(t)β€– 2 for all nonzero 𝑀(t) ∈ L 2 [0, ∞) if there are matrices 𝑃 p > 0, 𝑄 i > 0 (i = 1, 2, 3), 𝑅 > 0, 𝑆 j > 0 ( j = 1, 2), and appropriate dimension matrices 𝑁 l , 𝑂 l (l = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5), and a scalar Ξ΅ p > 0 such that the following LMI is satisfied:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By using Lemma 2, 𝛀 is equivalent to inequality (5), which means that ||𝑧|| 2 ≀ Ξ³||𝑀|| 2 is satisfied for any nonzero 𝑀(t) ∈ L 2 [0, ∞), which ensures the asymptotical stability of system (4). Theorem 2 For a prescribed scalar Ξ³ > 0 and some given positive scalars Ο„ m , Ο„ M , u, h and matrix K, system (4) with condition ( 2) is robustly asymptotically stable and satisfies ‖𝑧(t)β€– 2 ≀ γ‖𝑀(t)β€– 2 for all nonzero 𝑀(t) ∈ L 2 [0, ∞) if there are matrices 𝑃 p > 0, 𝑄 i > 0 (i = 1, 2, 3), 𝑅 > 0, 𝑆 j > 0 ( j = 1, 2), and appropriate dimension matrices 𝑁 l , 𝑂 l (l = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5), and a scalar Ξ΅ p > 0 such that the following LMI is satisfied:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] It is well recognized that the presence of time delay in a dynamical system is often a primary source of instability and performance degradation. Moreover, the delay-dependent [5] results are generally less conservative than the delay-independent ones, [6] especially when the delay is small. Recently, much attention has been paid to the robust stability problem for uncertain systems with time delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in most systems, such assumptions are not true. As such, there has been a great deal of work done showing both the passivity and robustness of time-delayed fuzzy systems [34], [35], [36].…”
Section: B Proposed Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is essential to consider the time-varying delay in impulsive CRDNNs. chaos control and synchronization and flow control [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. The main point of passivity theory is that the passive properties of systems can keep the systems internally stable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%