Further psychometric analysis of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory

Aldea, Mirela A.; Geffken, Gary R.; Jacob, Marni L.; Goodman, Wayne K.; Storch, Eric A.

doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.05.001

Cited by 32 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Items endorsed on the Y-BOCS-II-SC are consistent with symptoms endorsed in studies using self-report Symptom Checklists. For example, compulsive reassurance-seeking was either the firstor second-most frequently endorsed item on a self-report checklist of OCD symptoms (the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory [FOCI]; Storch et al, 2007) in two separate studies (Aldea, Geffken, Jacob, Goodman, & Storch, 2009;Storch et al, 2007).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric analysis of the Yale-Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale Second Edition Symptom Checklist

Storch

Larson

Price

et al. 2010

Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric analysis of the Yale-Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale Second Edition Symptom Checklist

Storch

Larson

Price

et al. 2010

Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The depression module and the somatic symptom scale of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9, PHQ-15) (Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2002;Löwe et al, 2004), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) (Kroenke et al, 2010;Löwe et al, 2008) and the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (FOCI) (Aldea et al, 2009;Storch et al, 2007) (German versions) were used to assess depressive, somatic, anxiety and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. The psychometric properties of these questionnaires have been shown to be good.…”

Section: Eating Disorder Psychopathology (Edi-2)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Aggregating factors of the change process in the treatment of anorexia nervosa

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For example, Storch et al Aldea, Geffken, Jacob, Goodman, and Storch (2009) examined the effect size in 89 people with OCD with FOCI, OCI-R and the Y-BOCS. They found a smaller effect size of treatment of 0.88 on the OCI-R compared to our IAPT sample (1.47), but more similar to our severe treatment refractory sample (0.88).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sensitivity to change in the Obsessive Compulsive Inventory: Comparing the standard and revised versions in two cohorts of different severity

Veale

Lim

Nathan

et al. 2016

Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Obsessive Compulsive Inventory (OCI) is often used as a screening instrument for symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and as an outcome measure for treatment. Three versions of the OCI are available: the original 42-item version, the revised 18-item version (OCI-R) and a shorter version that focuses on the highest subscale (OCI-R Main). Our aim was to determine sensitivity to change and evaluate cut-off scores for caseness in each version of the OCI using the same dataset. Method: We compared the effect size and the number of patients who achieved reliable and clinically significant change after cognitive behavior therapy in two samples of out-patients with OCD. One sample (n = 63) had OCD of minor to moderate severity and a second sample (n = 73) had severe, treatment refractory OCD. Results: In both samples, the OCI and OCI-R had very similar treatment effect sizes and to a lesser extent in the percentage who achieved reliable improvement and clinically significant change. The OCI-R Main was more sensitive to change than the OCI or OCI-R in both samples. All versions of the OCI were less sensitive to change compared with the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Discussion: The OCI-R is a valid self-report outcome measure for measuring change and is less burdensome for patients to complete than the OCI. Questions remain about whether the OCI or OCI-R is sufficiently sensitive to change for a service evaluation. We would recommend a slightly higher cut-off score of ≥17 on the OCI-R for the definition of caseness.

show abstract

Further psychometric analysis of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory

Cited by 32 publications

References 25 publications

Psychometric analysis of the Yale-Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale Second Edition Symptom Checklist

Psychometric analysis of the Yale-Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale Second Edition Symptom Checklist

Aggregating factors of the change process in the treatment of anorexia nervosa

Sensitivity to change in the Obsessive Compulsive Inventory: Comparing the standard and revised versions in two cohorts of different severity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About