1958
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(58)80011-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Observations on the use of I131-Labeled Lipids in the Study of Diseases of the Gastrointestinal Tract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1959
1959
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Andererseits ist zu empfehlen, die Radiolipidfraktion im Gesamtblut zu bestimmen, um den Einfluß von Hämatokritänderungen auszuschalten (5). Auch wenn verschiedene Möglichkeiten bestehen, die Resultate auszudrücken, so haben wir bei unseren Untersuchungen vorgezogen, die Endwerte prozentual zum Gesamtblutvolumen anzugeben, um die verschiedenen Fälle besser miteinander vergleichen zu können (70,56,6,55,57,26,39).…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified
“…Andererseits ist zu empfehlen, die Radiolipidfraktion im Gesamtblut zu bestimmen, um den Einfluß von Hämatokritänderungen auszuschalten (5). Auch wenn verschiedene Möglichkeiten bestehen, die Resultate auszudrücken, so haben wir bei unseren Untersuchungen vorgezogen, die Endwerte prozentual zum Gesamtblutvolumen anzugeben, um die verschiedenen Fälle besser miteinander vergleichen zu können (70,56,6,55,57,26,39).…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified
“…In small intestinal disorders on the other hand the absorption of both the neutral fat and fatty acid is impaired and therefore both the blood curves will be flat. Some observers (Ruffin et al, 1958) have had sufficient confidence in this test to use it for studying absorption in patients after gastrectomy, and have interpreted the combination of flat blood curves for triolein absorption with normal curves for oleic acid absorption as evidence of defective admixture of the pancreatic enzymes with the food. On the other hand some other observers (McKenna et al, 1957) have found blood absorption curves to be unreliable even as a means of detecting steatorrhoea as the following quotation from a recent paper shows (Grossman and Jordan, 1958): "all patients who excreted abnormally large amounts of lipid in the faces, as determined chemically also had abnormally high levels of radioactivity in the fices.…”
Section: Absorption Of Fatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggested that after the oral administration of labelled fat an index ofabsorption could be obtained from a measurement of either the subsequent blood radioactivity curve or the amount of unabsorbed radioactivity in the faeces. After initial enthusiasm (Baylin, Sanders, Isley, Shingleton, Hymans, Johnston, and Ruffin, 1955;Ruffin, Shingleton, Baylin, Hymans, Isley, Sanders, and Sohmer, 1956;Ruffin, Keever, Chears, Shingleton, Baylin, Isley, and Sanders, 1958) the use of the blood curve has been rejected by most investigators because its peak and shape were shown to be influenced by factors other than that due to fat absorption (Isley, Sanders, Baylin, Sharpe, Hymans, Ruffin, Shingleton, and Wilson, 1957;Mohamed and Hume, 1959;and Vidinli, Texter, and Cooper, 1963). More recently, the use of the measurement of faecal radioactivity after oral administration of labelled fat has also fallen into disrepute, chiefly because several workers found inconsistent correlation with chemical faecal fat estimation (eg, Pimparkar, Tulsky, Kalser, and Bockus, 1960;Cox, 1961;Clark, Crooks, Dawson, and Mitchell, 1964).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%